258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30563344)
1. Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor.
Levy Zamora M; Xiong F; Gentner D; Kerkez B; Kohrman-Glaser J; Koehler K
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 53(2):838-849. PubMed ID: 30563344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study.
Zusman M; Schumacher CS; Gassett AJ; Spalt EW; Austin E; Larson TV; Carvlin G; Seto E; Kaufman JD; Sheppard L
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105329. PubMed ID: 31783241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term field evaluation of the Plantower PMS low-cost particulate matter sensors.
Sayahi T; Butterfield A; Kelly KE
Environ Pollut; 2019 Feb; 245():932-940. PubMed ID: 30682749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring.
Liu X; Jayaratne R; Thai P; Kuhn T; Zing I; Christensen B; Lamont R; Dunbabin M; Zhu S; Gao J; Wainwright D; Neale D; Kan R; Kirkwood J; Morawska L
Environ Res; 2020 Jun; 185():109438. PubMed ID: 32276167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the value of complex refractive index and particle density for calibration of low-cost particle matter sensor for size-resolved particle count and PM2.5 measurements.
Huang CH; He J; Austin E; Seto E; Novosselov I
PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259745. PubMed ID: 34762676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter sensor.
Kelly KE; Whitaker J; Petty A; Widmer C; Dybwad A; Sleeth D; Martin R; Butterfield A
Environ Pollut; 2017 Feb; 221():491-500. PubMed ID: 28012666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a calibration chamber to evaluate the performance of low-cost particulate matter sensors.
Sayahi T; Kaufman D; Becnel T; Kaur K; Butterfield AE; Collingwood S; Zhang Y; Gaillardon PE; Kelly KE
Environ Pollut; 2019 Dec; 255(Pt 1):113131. PubMed ID: 31521992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design and evaluation of a portable PM
Tryner J; Quinn C; Windom BC; Volckens J
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2019 Aug; 21(8):1403-1415. PubMed ID: 31389929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of using low-cost portable particle monitors for measurement of fine and coarse particulate matter in urban ambient air.
Han I; Symanski E; Stock TH
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):330-340. PubMed ID: 27690287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laboratory Chamber Evaluation of Flow Air Quality Sensor PM
Crnosija N; Levy Zamora M; Rule AM; Payne-Sturges D
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 35742589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors for Indoor Air Monitoring during COVID-19 Lockdown.
Kaliszewski M; Włodarski M; Młyńczak J; Kopczyński K
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33353048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of time-resolved atmospheric conditions and indoor/outdoor particulate matter concentrations in homes with gas and biomass cook stoves in Nogales, Sonora, Mexico.
Holmes HA; Pardyjak ER
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Jul; 64(7):759-73. PubMed ID: 25122950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intercomparison of PurpleAir Sensor Performance over Three Years Indoors and Outdoors at a Home: Bias, Precision, and Limit of Detection Using an Improved Algorithm for Calculating PM
Wallace L
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of indoor and outdoor PM species at schools and residences in a high-altitude Ecuadorian urban center.
Raysoni AU; Armijos RX; Weigel MM; Montoya T; Eschanique P; Racines M; Li WW
Environ Pollut; 2016 Jul; 214():668-679. PubMed ID: 27149144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Particulate matter and manganese exposures in Indianapolis, Indiana.
Pellizzari ED; Clayton CA; Rodes CE; Mason RE; Piper LL; Fort B; Pfeifer G; Lynam D
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2001; 11(6):423-40. PubMed ID: 11791160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network.
Considine EM; Reid CE; Ogletree MR; Dye T
Environ Pollut; 2021 Jan; 268(Pt B):115833. PubMed ID: 33120139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On-field test and data calibration of a low-cost sensor for fine particles exposure assessment.
Jiang Y; Zhu X; Chen C; Ge Y; Wang W; Zhao Z; Cai J; Kan H
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Mar; 211():111958. PubMed ID: 33503545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the feasibility of a personal particle exposure monitor in outdoor and indoor microenvironments in Shanghai, China.
Wang K; Chen FE; Au W; Zhao Z; Xia ZL
Int J Environ Health Res; 2019 Apr; 29(2):209-220. PubMed ID: 30311769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
