148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30563362)
1. Influence of scan mode (partial/full rotations) and FOV size in the formation of artefacts in cone beam CT.
Costa EDD; Queiroz PM; Santaella GM; Capelozza ALA; Ambrosano GMB; Freitas DQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 May; 48(4):20180340. PubMed ID: 30563362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the shape of the field-of-view influence the magnitude of artefacts from high-density materials in cone-beam computed tomography?
Cascante-Sequeira D; Fontenele RC; Martins LAC; Brasil DM; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Oct; 52(7):20230147. PubMed ID: 37493606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.
Pauwels R; Zhang G; Theodorakou C; Walker A; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Cone-beam Computed Tomography Artifacts Produced by Metal Objects Located Within and Outside the Field of View.
Kassabji A; Tahmasbi M; Augsburger RA; Nair M; Kesterke MJ; Jalali P
J Endod; 2022 Feb; 48(2):249-254. PubMed ID: 34890593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a metal artefact reduction tool on different positions of a metal object in the FOV.
Queiroz PM; Santaella GM; da Paz TD; Freitas DQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Mar; 46(3):20160366. PubMed ID: 27910700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of metal artefacts on subjective perception of image quality of 13 CBCT devices.
Wanderley VA; Leite AF; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Pauwels R; Müller-García F; Becker K; Oliveira ML; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4457-4466. PubMed ID: 35166942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining scatter reduction and correction to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Jin JY; Ren L; Liu Q; Kim J; Wen N; Guan H; Movsas B; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5634-44. PubMed ID: 21158275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effective doses of dental cone beam computed tomography: effect of 360-degree versus 180-degree rotation angles.
Mutalik S; Tadinada A; Molina MR; Sinisterra A; Lurie A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Oct; 130(4):433-446. PubMed ID: 32616450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of gray values in CBCT and MSCT images for determination of density: influence of variation of FOV size.
Rodrigues AF; Campos MJ; Chaoubah A; Fraga MR; Farinazzo Vitral RW
Implant Dent; 2015 Apr; 24(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 25706259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scatter-to-primary ratio in dentomaxillofacial cone-beam CT: effect of field of view and beam energy.
Pauwels R; Pittayapat P; Sinpitaksakul P; Panmekiate S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Dec; 50(8):20200597. PubMed ID: 33882256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction of scatter-induced image noise in cone beam computed tomography: effect of field of view size and position.
Pauwels R; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Bosmans H; Panmekiate S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Feb; 121(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 26792756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of artefacts produced by metal posts on CBCT images.
Lira de Farias Freitas AP; Cavalcanti YW; Costa FCM; Peixoto LR; Maia AMA; Rovaris K; Bento PM; Melo DP
Int Endod J; 2019 Feb; 52(2):223-236. PubMed ID: 30107037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifacts using different CBCT devices, high-density materials and field of views.
Codari M; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo L; Haiter Neto F; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1509-1514. PubMed ID: 28432698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the dental spectral cone beam CT for metal artefact reduction.
Zhu L; Chen Y; Yang J; Tao X; Xi Y
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180044. PubMed ID: 30299983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Panoramic cone beam computed tomography.
Chang J; Zhou L; Wang S; Clifford Chao KS
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2930-46. PubMed ID: 22559664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective assessment of the combined effect of exomass-related- and motion artefacts in cone beam CT.
Oliveira ML; Candemil AP; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jan; 50(1):20200255. PubMed ID: 32706986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of an auto-edge counting method for quantification of metal artifacts in CBCT images: a multivariate analysis of object position, field of view size, tube voltage, and metal artifact reduction algorithm.
Khosravifard A; Saberi BV; Khosravifard N; Motallebi S; Kajan ZD; Ghaffari ME
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Dec; 132(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 33975812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are metal artefact reduction algorithms effective to correct cone beam CT artefacts arising from the exomass?
Candemil AP; Salmon B; Freitas DQ; Ambrosano GMB; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):20180290. PubMed ID: 30540919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality for visualization of cracks and fine endodontic structures using 10 CBCT devices with various scanning protocols and artefact conditions.
Pinto JC; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Leite AF; Wanderley VA; Pauwels R; Oliveira ML; Jacobs R; Tanomaru-Filho M
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4001. PubMed ID: 36899046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of the blooming artefact on dental implant dimensions in 13 cone-beam computed tomography devices.
Wanderley VA; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Leite AF; Pauwels R; Shujaat S; Jacobs R; Oliveira ML
Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Jul; 7(1):67. PubMed ID: 34258634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
