These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30563362)

  • 21. Characterization of Scattered X-Ray Photons in Dental Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Yang CC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149904. PubMed ID: 26950435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Convex triangular vs. cylindrical field of view: how does the shape of the FOV affect radiation dose?
    Cascante-Sequeira D; Oliveira-Santos C; Brasil DM; Santaella GM; Swanson C; Blackburn M; Scarfe WC; Haiter-Neto F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7881-7888. PubMed ID: 37993703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of the exomass on the detection of simulated root fracture in cone-beam CT - an
    Candemil AP; Mangione F; Vasconcelos KF; Oenning AC; Jacobs R; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Salmon B; Oliveira ML
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 May; 50(4):20200450. PubMed ID: 33237809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis?
    Ting S; Attaia D; Johnson KB; Kossa SS; Friedland B; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 33378479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the efficacy of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in different cone beam computed tomography scanning parameters.
    Queiroz PM; Groppo FC; Oliveira ML; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Jun; 123(6):729-734. PubMed ID: 28412235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the expression of the volumetric alteration artifact in cylindrical and triangular fields of view in two cone-beam computed tomography devices.
    Cascante-Sequeira D; Coelho-Silva F; Rosado LPL; Freitas DQ; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Haiter-Neto F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):1025-1033. PubMed ID: 34324084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does the size of an object containing dental implant affect the expression of artifacts in cone beam computed tomography imaging?
    Moshfeghi M; Safi Y; Różyło-Kalinowska I; Gandomi S
    Head Face Med; 2022 Jun; 18(1):20. PubMed ID: 35765076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Image quality optimization of narrow detector dental computed tomography for paediatric patients.
    Brasil DM; Pauwels R; Coucke W; Haiter-Neto F; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Jul; 48(5):20190032. PubMed ID: 30864834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Effect of Different Field of View Sizes on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units: An In-Vitro Study.
    Niktash A; Mehralizadeh S; Talaeipour A
    Front Dent; 2022; 19():32. PubMed ID: 36865948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effective dose estimation in cone-beam computed tomography for dental use by Monte-Carlo simulation optimizing calculation numbers using a step-and-shoot method.
    Ozaki Y; Watanabe H; Kurabayashi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Oct; 50(7):20210084. PubMed ID: 33929892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CBCT image artefacts generated by implants located inside the field of view or in the exomass.
    Demirturk Kocasarac H; Koenig LJ; Ustaoglu G; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Feb; 51(2):20210092. PubMed ID: 34289314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cone-beam CT imaging with laterally enlarged field of view based on independently movable source and detector.
    Karius A; Szkitsak J; Strnad V; Fietkau R; Bert C
    Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):5135-5149. PubMed ID: 37194354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Image quality optimization using a narrow vertical detector dental cone-beam CT.
    Brasil DM; Pauwels R; Coucke W; Haiter-Neto F; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):20180357. PubMed ID: 30604636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dosimetry in CBCT with Different Protocols: Emphasis on Small FOVs Including Exams for TMJ.
    Nascimento HAR; Andrade MEA; Frazão MAG; Nascimento EHL; Ramos-Perez FMM; Freitas DQ
    Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(4):511-516. PubMed ID: 29160405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dual-rotation C-arm cone-beam computed tomography to increase low-contrast detection.
    Reshef A; Riddell C; Trousset Y; Ladjal S; Bloch I
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e164-e173. PubMed ID: 28901617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of size of field of view (FOV), position within the FOV, and scanning mode on the detection of root fracture and observer's perception of artifacts in CBCT images.
    de Oliveira Pinto MG; Melo SLS; Suassuna FCM; Marinho LE; Leite JBDS; Batista AUD; Bento PM; Melo DP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Sep; 50(6):20200563. PubMed ID: 33565884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The performance of metal artifact reduction algorithms in cone beam computed tomography images considering the effects of materials, metal positions, and fields of view.
    Vasconcelos KF; Codari M; Queiroz PM; Nicolielo LFP; Freitas DQ; Sforza C; Jacobs R; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Jan; 127(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 30528550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contrast-to-noise ratio with different large volumes in a cone-beam computerized tomography machine: an in vitro study.
    Bechara B; McMahan CA; Moore WS; Noujeim M; Geha H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Nov; 114(5):658-65. PubMed ID: 23083479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does cone-beam CT convex triangular field of view influence the image shape distortion of high-density materials?
    Cascante-Sequeira D; Coelho-Silva F; Lopes Rosado LP; Lucca LV; Queiroz Freitas D; Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz S; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230029. PubMed ID: 37427699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of exposure parameters of cone beam computed tomography on metal artifact reduction around the dental implants in various bone densities.
    Shokri A; Jamalpour MR; Khavid A; Mohseni Z; Sadeghi M
    BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Apr; 19(1):34. PubMed ID: 31035955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.