BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30563834)

  • 1. A Strategy To Exploit Surrogate Sire Technology in Livestock Breeding Programs.
    Gottardo P; Gorjanc G; Battagin M; Gaynor RC; Jenko J; Ros-Freixedes R; Bruce A Whitelaw C; Mileham AJ; Herring WO; Hickey JM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Jan; 9(1):203-215. PubMed ID: 30563834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spermatogonial Stem Cell Transplantation: Insights and Outlook for Domestic Animals.
    Giassetti MI; Ciccarelli M; Oatley JM
    Annu Rev Anim Biosci; 2019 Feb; 7():385-401. PubMed ID: 30762440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of genotype x environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs.
    Mulder HA; Bijma P
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 15583042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs.
    Jenko J; Gorjanc G; Cleveland MA; Varshney RK; Whitelaw CB; Woolliams JA; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Jul; 47(1):55. PubMed ID: 26133579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrating genomic selection into dairy cattle breeding programmes: a review.
    Bouquet A; Juga J
    Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):705-13. PubMed ID: 23200196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating sire selection practices using lifetime net income functions.
    Cassell BG; Jobst SM; McGilliard ML; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Dec; 85(12):3492-502. PubMed ID: 12512623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):493-500. PubMed ID: 21183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of international conversions of elite sires and cows when conversion equations are based on linear regression.
    Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 Dec; 80(12):3420-4. PubMed ID: 9436124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between genomic predictions using daughter yield deviation and conventional estimated breeding value as response variables.
    Guo G; Lund MS; Zhang Y; Su G
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Dec; 127(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 21077966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of accounting for different phenotypic variances by sire breed and sex on selection of sires based on expected progeny differences for 200- and 365-day weights.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Sep; 73(9):2589-99. PubMed ID: 8582848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of breeding values for feed intake and feed efficiency traits in dairy cattle: When dry matter intake recordings are sparse under different scenarios.
    Negussie E; Mehtiö T; Mäntysaari P; Løvendahl P; Mäntysaari EA; Lidauer MH
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7248-7262. PubMed ID: 31155258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs.
    Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):44. PubMed ID: 24171942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection for uniformity in livestock by exploiting genetic heterogeneity of residual variance.
    Mulder HA; Bijma P; Hill WG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2008; 40(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 18096114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of controlling instruments for improvements in cow sire selection.
    König S; Lessner S; Simianer H
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Apr; 90(4):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17369238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short communication: Field fertility in Holstein bulls: Can type of breeding strategy (artificial insemination following estrus versus timed artificial insemination) alter service sire fertility?
    Batista EOS; Vieira LM; Sá Filho MF; Carvalho PD; Rivera H; Cabrera V; Wiltbank MC; Baruselli PS; Souza AH
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2010-2015. PubMed ID: 26778314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recent progress in livestock genomics and potential impact on breeding programs.
    Georges M
    Theriogenology; 2001 Jan; 55(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11198079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulation study on the efficiencies of MOET nucleus breeding schemes applying marker assisted selection in dairy cattle.
    Luo W; Wang Y; Zhang Y
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Mar; 52(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 19294355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of testis germ cell transplantation in breeding systems of food producing species: a review.
    Herrid M; McFarlane JR
    Anim Biotechnol; 2013; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23947666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.