These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30565230)

  • 21. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nucleus accumbens core lesions retard instrumental learning and performance with delayed reinforcement in the rat.
    Cardinal RN; Cheung TH
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 6():9. PubMed ID: 15691387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Operant responding for conditioned and unconditioned reinforcers in rats is differentially enhanced by the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Nov; 189(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 17019569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of signaled reinforcement on response variability.
    Reed P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Mar; 119(2):286-299. PubMed ID: 36706032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.
    Mobini S; Chiang TJ; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Nov; 152(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 11140331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of medial septal lesions on action-outcome associations in rats under conditions of delayed reinforcement.
    Numan R; Ouimette AS; Holloway KA; Curry CE
    Behav Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 118(6):1240-52. PubMed ID: 15598133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Response-reinforcer dependency and resistance to change.
    Cançado CRX; Abreu-Rodrigues J; Aló RM; Hauck F; Doughty AH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):176-193. PubMed ID: 28817193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Resurgence of ethanol seeking following voluntary abstinence produced by nondrug differential reinforcement of other behavior.
    Craig AR; Agnew CN; Derrenbacker KE; Antúnez BA; Sullivan WE; Smith SW; DeBartelo J; Roane HS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2024 May; 121(3):314-326. PubMed ID: 38499477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of drugs on response-duration differentiation VII: response-force requirements.
    McClure GY; Hardwick WC; McMillan DE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Nov; 74(3):295-309. PubMed ID: 11218227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of reinforcement rate and delay on the acquisition of lever pressing by rats.
    Bruner CA; Avila R; Acuña L; Gallardo LM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 9465413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.
    Mobini S; Body S; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; Deakin JF; Anderson IM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Mar; 160(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 11889498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of place of reinforcer delivery in the appearance of positive induction when rats respond for 1% sucrose.
    Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Kristiansen-Moen LA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 16782285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of pre-trial response requirements on self-control choices by rats and pigeons.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Mar; 97(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 22389527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early extinction effects following intermittent reinforcement: Little evidence of extinction bursts.
    Lattal KA; Kuroda T; Cook JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Jul; 114(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 32639050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on response acquisition with unsignaled delayed reinforcement.
    Doughty AH; Galuska CM; Dawson AE; Brierley KP
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):287-90. PubMed ID: 22407257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Within-session rates of responding when reinforcer magnitude is changed within the session.
    Weatherly JN; McSweeney FK; Swindell S
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 14977028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The distribution of response bout lengths and its sensitivity to differential reinforcement.
    Brackney RJ; Sanabria F
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Sep; 104(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 26377437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Body weight and response acquisition with delayed reinforcement.
    Lattal KA; Williams AM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Jan; 67(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 9037784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automatic reinforcement from operant wheel-running undermines temporal control by fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD; Welsh TM
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():91-101. PubMed ID: 30219288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.