These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30565230)

  • 41. Rats' lever-press durations as psychophysical judgements of time.
    Platt JR; Kuch DO; Bitgood SC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Mar; 19(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 4716170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cocaine self-administration on a hold-down schedule of reinforcement in rats.
    Morgan D; Liu Y; Oleson EB; Roberts DC
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2009 Jan; 201(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 18797847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bouts of responding from variable-interval reinforcement of lever pressing by rats.
    Shull RL; Grimes JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Sep; 80(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 14674726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Rats do not respond differently in the presence of stimuli signaling wheel-running reinforcers of different durations.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2007 May; 75(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 17293061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on changeover behaviour in concurrent schedules of reinforcement.
    Al-Ruwaitea AS; Chiang TJ; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Jun; 144(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 10435393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Operant behavior in dwarf hamsters (Phodopus campbelli): Effects of rate of reinforcement and reinforcer flavor variety.
    Lupfer-Johnson G; Murphy ES; Blackwell LC; LaCasse JL; Drummond S
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jun; 84(2):573-80. PubMed ID: 20188801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reinforcing effects of contingently administered subcutaneous injections of etonitazene in rats.
    Gomez TH; Meisch RA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Dec; 153(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 11255923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Resurgence as Choice in Context: Treatment duration and on/off alternative reinforcement.
    Shahan TA; Browning KO; Nall RW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Jan; 113(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 31777091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Operant variability when reinforcement is delayed.
    Wagner K; Neuringer A
    Learn Behav; 2006 May; 34(2):111-23. PubMed ID: 16933797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dissociating the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine using a rat self-administration paradigm with concurrently available drug and environmental reinforcers.
    Palmatier MI; Evans-Martin FF; Hoffman A; Caggiula AR; Chaudhri N; Donny EC; Liu X; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Mar; 184(3-4):391-400. PubMed ID: 16249908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Increased generalization in a peak procedure after delayed reinforcement.
    Buriticá J; Alcalá E
    Behav Processes; 2019 Dec; 169():103978. PubMed ID: 31580905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Is induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement the outcome of an increase in overall activity or in operant responding?
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Nurnberger JT
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 16475671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Second-order stimuli do not always increase overall response rates in second-order schedules of reinforcement in the rat.
    Wilson DI; Bowman EM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Jul; 174(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 15083254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effects of repeated treatment with 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on the lever press responding of the rat under FI and DRL schedules of food reinforcement.
    Evenden J; Ryan C; Palejko W
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1995 Jul; 120(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 7480539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Discrimination of variable schedules is controlled by interresponse times proximal to reinforcement.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A; Sakagami T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Nov; 98(3):341-54. PubMed ID: 23144509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Conditioned reinforcement in rats established with self-administered nicotine and enhanced by noncontingent nicotine.
    Palmatier MI; Liu X; Matteson GL; Donny EC; Caggiula AR; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Dec; 195(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 17676401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of progressive hold and progressive response schedules of reinforcement.
    Alvarez-Sekely CS; Toscano-Zapien AL; Salles-Ize P; Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Lopez-Guzman MA; Velazquez-Martinez DN
    Behav Processes; 2023 Feb; 205():104822. PubMed ID: 36669746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reinforcer magnitude and resurgence.
    Oliver AC; Nighbor TD; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Nov; 110(3):440-450. PubMed ID: 30431659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Response-food delay gradients for lever pressing and schedule-induced licking in rats.
    Pellón R; Pérez-Padilla A
    Learn Behav; 2013 Jun; 41(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 23271664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Rats respond for information: Metacognition in a rodent?
    Kirk CR; McMillan N; Roberts WA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Apr; 40(2):249-59. PubMed ID: 24893220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.