These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30565335)

  • 1. Accounting for population structure in selective cow genotyping strategies.
    Perez BC; Balieiro JCC; Carvalheiro R; Tirelo F; Oliveira Junior GA; Dementshuk JM; Eler JP; Ferraz JBS; Ventura RV
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Jan; 136(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 30565335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of using cow genomic information on accuracy and bias of genomic breeding values in a simulated Holstein dairy cattle population.
    Dehnavi E; Mahyari SA; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5166-5176. PubMed ID: 29605309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adding cows to the reference population makes a small dairy population competitive.
    Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC; Lund MS; Guldbrandtsen B
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5822-32. PubMed ID: 24996280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of genotyped cows in the reference population on the genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle.
    Uemoto Y; Osawa T; Saburi J
    Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):382-393. PubMed ID: 27515004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of genotyping different groups of animals on accuracy when moving from traditional to genomic selection.
    Pszczola M; Strabel T; van Arendonk JAM; Calus MPL
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5412-5421. PubMed ID: 22916948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sharing reference data and including cows in the reference population improve genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
    Su G; Ma P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Wiggans G; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1067-75. PubMed ID: 26330119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using genomics to enhance selection of novel traits in North American dairy cattle.
    Chesnais JP; Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; Sargolzaei M; Pryce JE; Miglior F
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2413-2427. PubMed ID: 26778318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.
    Gao H; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G; Byskov K; Jensen J
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9051-9. PubMed ID: 26433419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of cows in reference populations for genomic selection of new functional traits.
    Buch LH; Kargo M; Berg P; Lassen J; Sørensen AC
    Animal; 2012 Jun; 6(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 22558957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows.
    Ding X; Zhang Z; Li X; Wang S; Wu X; Sun D; Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Zhang Q
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5315-23. PubMed ID: 23746588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of selective genotyping strategies for prediction of breeding values in a population undergoing selection.
    Boligon AA; Long N; Albuquerque LG; Weigel KA; Gianola D; Rosa GJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4716-22. PubMed ID: 23372045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Pszczola M; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):431-41. PubMed ID: 21183054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic selection strategies in a small dairy cattle population evaluated for genetic gain and profit.
    Thomasen JR; Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):458-70. PubMed ID: 24239076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.
    Wiggans GR; Vanraden PM; Cooper TA
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jun; 95(6):3444-7. PubMed ID: 22612979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of methods for the implementation of genome-assisted evaluation of Spanish dairy cattle.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):625-34. PubMed ID: 23102955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining cow and bull reference populations to increase accuracy of genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Oct; 96(10):6703-15. PubMed ID: 23891299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Simianer H; Willam A
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):382-91. PubMed ID: 19109296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.