These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30565335)

  • 21. Potential gains in lifetime net merit from genomic testing of cows, heifers, and calves on commercial dairy farms.
    Weigel KA; Hoffman PC; Herring W; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Apr; 95(4):2215-25. PubMed ID: 22459867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
    Gunia M; Saintilan R; Venot E; Hozé C; Fouilloux MN; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3258-69. PubMed ID: 24948648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Review: Opportunities and challenges for small populations of dairy cattle in the era of genomics.
    Schöpke K; Swalve HH
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1050-60. PubMed ID: 26957010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimal strategies for the use of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding programs.
    Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Swalve HH; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4140-51. PubMed ID: 21787949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Single-step genomic model improved reliability and reduced the bias of genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9026-34. PubMed ID: 26433415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of cow reference group on validation reliability of genomic evaluation.
    Koivula M; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1061-6. PubMed ID: 27075712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
    Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Short communication: Analysis of genomic predictor population for Holstein dairy cattle in the United States--Effects of sex and age.
    Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Apr; 98(4):2785-8. PubMed ID: 25648811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Short communication: Improving accuracy of Jersey genomic evaluations in the United States and Denmark by sharing reference population bulls.
    Wiggans GR; Su G; Cooper TA; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3508-13. PubMed ID: 25771051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
    Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of predictor traits on accuracy of genomic breeding values for feed intake based on a limited cow reference population.
    Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Wall E; Strabel T; Calus MP
    Animal; 2013 Nov; 7(11):1759-68. PubMed ID: 23915541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genomic selection for feed efficiency in dairy cattle.
    Pryce JE; Wales WJ; de Haas Y; Veerkamp RF; Hayes BJ
    Animal; 2014 Jan; 8(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24128704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
    Reiner-Benaim A; Ezra E; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2892-2904. PubMed ID: 28189326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of evaluation bias caused by genomic preselection.
    Tyrisevä AM; Mäntysaari EA; Jakobsen J; Aamand GP; Dürr J; Fikse WF; Lidauer MH
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Apr; 101(4):3155-3163. PubMed ID: 29397162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing genomic prediction accuracy for Holstein sires using bootstrap aggregation sampling and leave-one-out cross validation.
    Mikshowsky AA; Gianola D; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):453-464. PubMed ID: 27889124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
    Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
    Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the impact of natural service bulls and genotype by environment interactions on genetic gain and inbreeding in organic dairy cattle genomic breeding programs.
    Yin T; Wensch-Dorendorf M; Simianer H; Swalve HH; König S
    Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):877-86. PubMed ID: 24703184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genomic selection for tolerance to heat stress in Australian dairy cattle.
    Nguyen TTT; Bowman PJ; Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):2849-2862. PubMed ID: 27037467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.