These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30565338)

  • 1. Attribute level overlap (and color coding) can reduce task complexity, improve choice consistency, and decrease the dropout rate in discrete choice experiments.
    Jonker MF; Donkers B; de Bekker-Grob E; Stolk EA
    Health Econ; 2019 Mar; 28(3):350-363. PubMed ID: 30565338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Level Overlap and Color Coding on Attribute Non-Attendance in Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Jonker MF; Donkers B; de Bekker-Grob EW; Stolk EA
    Value Health; 2018 Jul; 21(7):767-771. PubMed ID: 30005748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
    Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mimicking Real-Life Decision Making in Health: Allowing Respondents Time to Think in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Veldwijk J; Johansson JV; Donkers B; de Bekker-Grob EW
    Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):945-952. PubMed ID: 32762997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a full and partial choice set design in a labeled discrete choice experiment.
    Thai T; Bliemer M; Chen G; Spinks J; de New S; Lancsar E
    Health Econ; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1284-1304. PubMed ID: 36880352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulation study to determine the impact of different design features on design efficiency in discrete choice experiments.
    Vanniyasingam T; Cunningham CE; Foster G; Thabane L
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011985. PubMed ID: 27436671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are Efficient Designs Used in Discrete Choice Experiments Too Difficult for Some Respondents? A Case Study Eliciting Preferences for End-of-Life Care.
    Flynn TN; Bilger M; Malhotra C; Finkelstein EA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Mar; 34(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26589411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the impact of excluded attributes on choice in a discrete choice experiment using a follow-up question.
    Mansfield C; Sutphin J; Boeri M
    Health Econ; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1307-1315. PubMed ID: 32627284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences.
    Maddala T; Phillips KA; Reed Johnson F
    Health Econ; 2003 Dec; 12(12):1035-47. PubMed ID: 14673812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Words or graphics to present a Discrete Choice Experiment: Does it matter?
    Veldwijk J; Lambooij MS; van Til JA; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Nov; 98(11):1376-84. PubMed ID: 26117796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Are Debriefing Questions Used in Health Discrete Choice Experiments? An Online Survey.
    Pearce AM; Mulhern BJ; Watson V; Viney RC
    Value Health; 2020 Mar; 23(3):289-293. PubMed ID: 32197722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is Easier Better Than Harder? An Experiment on Choice Experiments for Benefit-Risk Tradeoff Preferences.
    Yang JC; Reed SD; Hass S; Skeen MB; Johnson FR
    Med Decis Making; 2021 Feb; 41(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 33463397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of Survey Administration Mode on the Results of a Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiment: Online and Paper Comparison.
    Determann D; Lambooij MS; Steyerberg EW; de Bekker-Grob EW; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2017; 20(7):953-960. PubMed ID: 28712625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Keeping an eye on cost: What can eye tracking tell us about attention to cost information in discrete choice experiments?
    Genie MG; Ryan M; Krucien N
    Health Econ; 2023 May; 32(5):1101-1119. PubMed ID: 36737875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Swait JD; Kassahun HT; Bliemer MCJ; Jonker MF; Veldwijk J; Cong K; Rose JM; Donkers B
    Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 31511182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Exploratory Application of Eye-Tracking Methods in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Vass C; Rigby D; Tate K; Stewart A; Payne K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):658-672. PubMed ID: 30074879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
    Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
    Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 28964450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Performance of Kaizen Tasks Across Three Online Discrete Choice Experiment Surveys: An Evidence Synthesis.
    Craig BM; Jumamyradov M; Rivero-Arias O
    Patient; 2024 Nov; 17(6):635-644. PubMed ID: 39031285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.
    Pearce A; Harrison M; Watson V; Street DJ; Howard K; Bansback N; Bryan S
    Patient; 2021 Jan; 14(1):17-53. PubMed ID: 33141359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of including an opt-out option in discrete choice experiments.
    Veldwijk J; Lambooij MS; de Bekker-Grob EW; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111805. PubMed ID: 25365169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.