630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30565673)
1. Management of HPV-positive women in cervical screening using results from two consecutive screening rounds.
Polman NJ; Veldhuijzen NJ; Heideman DAM; Snijders PJF; Meijer CJLM; Berkhof J
Int J Cancer; 2019 May; 144(9):2339-2346. PubMed ID: 30565673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.
Aoyama-Kikawa S; Fujita H; Hanley SJB; Kasamo M; Kikuchi K; Torigoe T; Matsuno Y; Tamakoshi A; Sasaki T; Matsuura M; Kato Y; Dong P; Watari H; Saito T; Sengoku K; Sakuragi N
Cancer Sci; 2018 Jun; 109(6):2003-2012. PubMed ID: 29660849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.
Torres-Ibarra L; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT; Spiegelman D; Lazcano-Ponce E; Franco EL; Moscicki AB; Mahmud SM; Wheeler CM; Rivera-Paredez B; Hernández-López R; León-Maldonado L; Salmerón J;
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1915781. PubMed ID: 31747033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical relevance of partial HPV16/18 genotyping in stratifying HPV-positive women attending routine cervical cancer screening: a population-based cohort study.
Gori S; Battagello J; Gustinucci D; Campari C; Zorzi M; Frayle H; Passamonti B; Sartori G; Bulletti S; Fodero C; Cesarini E; Faggiano R; Del Mistro A
BJOG; 2021 Jul; 128(8):1353-1362. PubMed ID: 33326680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-year longitudinal data on the clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in a cervical cancer screening setting.
Poljak M; Oštrbenk A; Seme K; Šterbenc A; Jančar N; Vrtačnik Bokal E
J Clin Virol; 2016 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():S29-S39. PubMed ID: 26643051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Performance of combined liquid based cytology and HPV nucleic acid test for detecting cervical precancer among women attending screening].
Jiang MY; Feng RM; Wang L; Li TY; Zhang AA; Cui JF; Pan QJ; Zhang X; Liu ML; Gao F; Chen W; Qiao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 40(10):750-756. PubMed ID: 30392339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary HPV testing verification: A retrospective ad-hoc analysis of screening algorithms on women doubly tested for cytology and HPV.
Tracht J; Wrenn A; Eltoum IE
Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 Jul; 45(7):580-586. PubMed ID: 28436211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lower cost strategies for triage of human papillomavirus DNA-positive women.
Qiao YL; Jeronimo J; Zhao FH; Schweizer J; Chen W; Valdez M; Lu P; Zhang X; Kang LN; Bansil P; Paul P; Mahoney C; Berard-Bergery M; Bai P; Peck R; Li J; Chen F; Stoler MH; Castle PE
Int J Cancer; 2014 Jun; 134(12):2891-901. PubMed ID: 24248915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protocol for Compass: a randomised controlled trial of primary HPV testing versus cytology screening for cervical cancer in HPV-unvaccinated and vaccinated women aged 25-69 years living in Australia.
Canfell K; Saville M; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Brotherton J; Heley S; Castle PE
BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e016700. PubMed ID: 29374658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Real-world research on cervical cancer screening program and effect evaluation for Chinese population].
Zhao YQ; Dai Y; Dang L; Kong LH; Zhang Y; Feng RM; Qiao YL; Lang JH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 40(10):764-771. PubMed ID: 30392341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.
Song F; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Wu R;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Sequential Rounds of Cervical Cancer Screening on Management of HPV-positive Women: A 15-year Population-based Cohort Study from China.
Xu XQ; Rezhake R; Hu SY; Chen F; Zhang X; Pan QJ; Zhang WH; Ma JF; Qiao YL; Zhao FH; Cruickshank M
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2021 Mar; 14(3):363-372. PubMed ID: 33303694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with extended HPV genotyping triage for cervical cancer screening: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from nine population-based cervical cancer screening studies from China.
Dun C; Yuan M; Zhao X; Hu S; Arbyn M; Zhao F
Cancer Med; 2024 Jun; 13(11):e7316. PubMed ID: 38828559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefits and potential harms of human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening: A real-world comparison of HPV testing versus cytology.
Thomsen LT; Kjaer SK; Munk C; Ørnskov D; Waldstrøm M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Mar; 100(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 33566361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety of extending screening intervals beyond five years in cervical screening programmes with testing for high risk human papillomavirus: 14 year follow-up of population based randomised cohort in the Netherlands.
Dijkstra MG; van Zummeren M; Rozendaal L; van Kemenade FJ; Helmerhorst TJ; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; Berkhof J
BMJ; 2016 Oct; 355():i4924. PubMed ID: 27702796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of cytology, HPV DNA testing and HPV 16/18 genotyping alone or combined targeting to the more balanced methodology for cervical cancer screening.
Chatzistamatiou K; Moysiadis T; Moschaki V; Panteleris N; Agorastos T
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 142(1):120-127. PubMed ID: 27126005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The performance of human papillomavirus DNA detection with type 16/18 genotyping by hybrid capture in primary test of cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study in 10,669 Chinese women.
Zhao X; Wu Q; Wang X; Fu Y; Zhang X; Tian X; Cheng B; Lu B; Yu X; Lan S; Lu W; Ma D; Cheng X; Xie X
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2018 Dec; 24(12):1322-1327. PubMed ID: 29518562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
