These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30566258)

  • 1. Using a monotone single-index model to stabilize the propensity score in missing data problems and causal inference.
    Qin J; Yu T; Li P; Liu H; Chen B
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(8):1442-1458. PubMed ID: 30566258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An alternative empirical likelihood method in missing response problems and causal inference.
    Ren K; Drummond CA; Brewster PS; Haller ST; Tian J; Cooper CJ; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(27):5009-5028. PubMed ID: 27417265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
    Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A model averaging approach for estimating propensity scores by optimizing balance.
    Xie Y; Zhu Y; Cotton CA; Wu P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):84-101. PubMed ID: 28712346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical inference for missing data mechanisms.
    Zhao Y
    Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4325-4333. PubMed ID: 32815184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Propensity Score Weighting with Missing Data on Covariates and Clustered Data Structure.
    Liu X
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(3):411-433. PubMed ID: 38379305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A; Wolfe R
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4382-400. PubMed ID: 23086504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Propensity weighting plus adjustment in proportional hazards model is not doubly robust.
    Gabriel EE; Sachs MC; Waernbaum I; Goetghebeur E; Blanche PF; Vansteelandt S; Sjölander A; Scheike T
    Biometrics; 2024 Jul; 80(3):. PubMed ID: 39036984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects.
    Xie Y; Cotton C; Zhu Y
    Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4238-4251. PubMed ID: 32857876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An alternative robust estimator of average treatment effect in causal inference.
    Liu J; Ma Y; Wang L
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):910-923. PubMed ID: 29441521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
    Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Parametric, Nonparametric, and Semiparametric Estimators: The Weibull Trials.
    Cole SR; Edwards JK; Breskin A; Hudgens MG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 190(8):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 33569578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of empirical Bayes and propensity score methods for road safety evaluation: A simulation study.
    Li H; Graham DJ; Ding H; Ren G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():148-155. PubMed ID: 31150921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Targeted estimation of nuisance parameters to obtain valid statistical inference.
    van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(1):29-57. PubMed ID: 24516006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with generalized linear outcome models for doubly robust estimation.
    Gabriel EE; Sachs MC; Martinussen T; Waernbaum I; Goetghebeur E; Vansteelandt S; Sjölander A
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(3):534-547. PubMed ID: 38096856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.