These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30568849)

  • 1. An experimental comparison of composite and grab sampling of stream water for metagenetic analysis of environmental DNA.
    Cornman RS; McKenna JE; Fike J; Oyler-McCance SJ; Johnson R
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5871. PubMed ID: 30568849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Composition and distribution of fish environmental DNA in an Adirondack watershed.
    Cornman RS; McKenna JE; Fike JA
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e10539. PubMed ID: 33680576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grab what you can-an evaluation of spatial replication to decrease heterogeneity in sediment eDNA metabarcoding.
    Hestetun JT; Lanzén A; Dahlgren TG
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11619. PubMed ID: 34221724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs?
    Stauffer S; Jucker M; Keggin T; Marques V; Andrello M; Bessudo S; Cheutin MC; Borrero-Pérez GH; Richards E; Dejean T; Hocdé R; Juhel JB; Ladino F; Letessier TB; Loiseau N; Maire E; Mouillot D; Mutis Martinezguerra M; Manel S; Polanco Fernández A; Valentini A; Velez L; Albouy C; Pellissier L; Waldock C
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Nov; 11(21):14630-14643. PubMed ID: 34765130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revisiting the effect of PCR replication and sequencing depth on biodiversity metrics in environmental DNA metabarcoding.
    Shirazi S; Meyer RS; Shapiro B
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Nov; 11(22):15766-15779. PubMed ID: 34824788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Environmental DNA method for estimating salamander distribution in headwater streams, and a comparison of water sampling methods.
    Katano I; Harada K; Doi H; Souma R; Minamoto T
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176541. PubMed ID: 28520733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Isothermal amplification of environmental DNA (eDNA) for direct field-based monitoring and laboratory confirmation of Dreissena sp.
    Williams MR; Stedtfeld RD; Engle C; Salach P; Fakher U; Stedtfeld T; Dreelin E; Stevenson RJ; Latimore J; Hashsham SA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186462. PubMed ID: 29036210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fish eDNA metabarcoding from aquatic biofilm samples: Methodological aspects.
    Rivera SF; Rimet F; Vasselon V; Vautier M; Domaizon I; Bouchez A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 May; 22(4):1440-1453. PubMed ID: 34863036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Net overboard: Comparing marine eDNA sampling methodologies at sea to unravel marine biodiversity.
    von Ammon U; Pochon X; Casanovas P; Trochel B; Zirngibl M; Thomas A; Witting J; Joyce P; Zaiko A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Feb; 23(2):440-452. PubMed ID: 36226834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing arthropod diversity metrics derived from stream environmental DNA: spatiotemporal variation and paired comparisons with manual sampling.
    Aunins AA; Mueller SJ; Fike JA; Cornman RS
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15163. PubMed ID: 37020852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-throughput environmental DNA analysis informs a biological assessment of an urban stream.
    Bagley M; Pilgrim E; Knapp M; Yoder C; Domingo JS; Banerji A
    Ecol Indic; 2019; 104():378-389. PubMed ID: 31275063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental DNA.
    Nevers MB; Przybyla-Kelly K; Shively D; Morris CC; Dickey J; Byappanahalli MN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244086. PubMed ID: 33370371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring of spatiotemporal occupancy patterns of fish and amphibian species in a lentic aquatic system using environmental DNA.
    Brys R; Haegeman A; Halfmaerten D; Neyrinck S; Staelens A; Auwerx J; Ruttink T
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3097-3110. PubMed ID: 33222312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing without harvesting: Pros and cons of environmental DNA sampling and image analysis for marine biodiversity evaluation.
    Kopp D; Faillettaz R; Le Joncour A; Simon J; Morandeau F; Le Bourdonnec P; Bouché L; Méhault S
    Mar Environ Res; 2023 Jun; 188():106004. PubMed ID: 37127004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring.
    Ruan HT; Wang RL; Li HT; Liu L; Kuang TX; Li M; Zou KS
    Zool Res; 2022 Mar; 43(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 35084125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using eDNA sampling for species-specific fish detection in tropical oceanic samples: limitations and recommendations for future use.
    Gonzalez Colmenares GM; Gonzalez Montes AJ; Harms-Tuohy CA; Schizas NV
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14810. PubMed ID: 36751629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of fish communities using environmental DNA: Effect of spatial sampling design in lentic systems of different sizes.
    Zhang S; Lu Q; Wang Y; Wang X; Zhao J; Yao M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Jan; 20(1):242-255. PubMed ID: 31625686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of vertebrates from natural and artificial inland water bodies in a semi-arid habitat using eDNA from filtered, swept, and sediment samples.
    McDonald R; Bateman PW; Cooper C; van der Heyde M; Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M; Hedges BA; Guzik MT; Nevill P
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e10014. PubMed ID: 37113520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the sampling effort for the metabarcoding-based detection of fish environmental DNA in the open ocean.
    Kawakami T; Yamazaki A; Asami M; Goto Y; Yamanaka H; Hyodo S; Ueno H; Kasai A
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e9921. PubMed ID: 36969932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mapping differences in mammalian distributions and diversity using environmental DNA from rivers.
    Broadhurst HA; Gregory LM; Bleakley EK; Perkins JC; Lavin JV; Bolton P; Browett SS; Howe CV; Singleton N; Tansley D; Sales NG; McDevitt AD
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Dec; 801():149724. PubMed ID: 34467903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.