These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Identifying Species Network Features from Gene Tree Quartets Under the Coalescent Model. Baños H Bull Math Biol; 2019 Feb; 81(2):494-534. PubMed ID: 30094772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Introduction. Statistical and computational challenges in molecular phylogenetics and evolution. Goldman N; Yang Z Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):3889-92. PubMed ID: 18852095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On the Number of Non-equivalent Ancestral Configurations for Matching Gene Trees and Species Trees. Disanto F; Rosenberg NA Bull Math Biol; 2019 Feb; 81(2):384-407. PubMed ID: 28913585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifiability and Reconstructibility of Species Phylogenies Under a Modified Coalescent. Long C; Kubatko L Bull Math Biol; 2019 Feb; 81(2):408-430. PubMed ID: 29926380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The identifiability of covarion models in phylogenetics. Allman ES; Rhodes JA IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 19179700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensions of Group-Based Phylogenetic Mixtures. Baños H; Bushek N; Davidson R; Gross E; Harris PE; Krone R; Long C; Stewart A; Walker R Bull Math Biol; 2019 Feb; 81(2):316-336. PubMed ID: 30225594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tropical Principal Component Analysis and Its Application to Phylogenetics. Yoshida R; Zhang L; Zhang X Bull Math Biol; 2019 Feb; 81(2):568-597. PubMed ID: 30206809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifiability of Phylogenetic Parameters from k-mer Data Under the Coalescent. Durden C; Sullivant S Bull Math Biol; 2019 Feb; 81(2):431-451. PubMed ID: 29392644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Algebraic double cut and join : A group-theoretic approach to the operator on multichromosomal genomes. Bhatia S; Egri-Nagy A; Francis AR J Math Biol; 2015 Nov; 71(5):1149-78. PubMed ID: 25502846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maximum Likelihood Estimates of Rearrangement Distance: Implementing a Representation-Theoretic Approach. Terauds V; Sumner J Bull Math Biol; 2019 Feb; 81(2):535-567. PubMed ID: 30264286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A note on probabilistic models over strings: the linear algebra approach. Bouchard-Côté A Bull Math Biol; 2013 Dec; 75(12):2529-50. PubMed ID: 24135792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Closed form modeling of evolutionary rates by exponential Brownian functionals. Privault N; Guindon S J Math Biol; 2015 Dec; 71(6-7):1387-409. PubMed ID: 25716798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When is a Phylogenetic Network Simply an Amalgamation of Two Trees? Semple C; Simpson J Bull Math Biol; 2018 Sep; 80(9):2338-2348. PubMed ID: 29981001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical tests of gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity in models of sequence evolution in phylogenetics. Goldman N; Whelan S Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Jun; 17(6):975-8. PubMed ID: 10833204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Algebraic model checking for Boolean gene regulatory networks. Tran QN Adv Exp Med Biol; 2011; 696():113-22. PubMed ID: 21431552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]