These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30569596)

  • 1. Design and analysis considerations for combining data from multiple biomarker studies.
    Sloan A; Song Y; Gail MH; Betensky R; Rosner B; Ziegler RG; Smith-Warner SA; Wang M
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(8):1303-1320. PubMed ID: 30569596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical methods for biomarker data pooled from multiple nested case-control studies.
    Sloan A; Smith-Warner SA; Ziegler RG; Wang M
    Biostatistics; 2021 Jul; 22(3):541-557. PubMed ID: 31750898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ANALYSIS OF COMBINED CATEGORICAL BIOMARKER DATA FROM MULTIPLE STUDIES.
    Cheng C; Wang M
    Ann Appl Stat; 2020 Sep; 14(3):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 33633815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spline Analysis of Biomarker Data Pooled from Multiple Matched/Nested Case-Control Studies.
    Wu Y; Gail M; Smith-Warner S; Ziegler R; Wang M
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 35681763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical methods for analysis of combined biomarker data from multiple nested case-control studies.
    Cheng C; Sloan A; Wang M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Aug; 30(8):1944-1959. PubMed ID: 34232834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A repeated measures approach to pooled and calibrated biomarker data.
    Sloan A; Cheng C; Rosner B; Ziegler RG; Smith-Warner SA; Wang M
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1485-1495. PubMed ID: 34967001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calibration and seasonal adjustment for matched case-control studies of vitamin D and cancer.
    Gail MH; Wu J; Wang M; Yaun SS; Cook NR; Eliassen AH; McCullough ML; Yu K; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A; Smith-Warner SA; Ziegler RG; Carroll RJ
    Stat Med; 2016 Jun; 35(13):2133-48. PubMed ID: 27133461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability of molecular biomarker measurements from nonlinear calibration curves.
    Gange SJ; Muñoz A; Wang JS; Groopman JD
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jan; 5(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 8770468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Discriminant Function Approach to Adjust for Processing and Measurement Error When a Biomarker is Assayed in Pooled Samples.
    Lyles RH; Van Domelen D; Mitchell EM; Schisterman EF
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Nov; 12(11):14723-40. PubMed ID: 26593934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Within-subject Pooling of Biological Samples to Reduce Exposure Misclassification in Biomarker-based Studies.
    Perrier F; Giorgis-Allemand L; Slama R; Philippat C
    Epidemiology; 2016 May; 27(3):378-88. PubMed ID: 27035688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing and combining data across multiple sources via integration of paired-sample data to correct for measurement error.
    Huang Y; Huang Y; Moodie Z; Li S; Self S
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(28):3748-59. PubMed ID: 22764070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of bias-correction methods for exposure measurement error using repeated measurements with and without missing data.
    Batistatou E; McNamee R
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(28):3467-80. PubMed ID: 22733598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating concentration estimation errors in ELISA microarray experiments.
    Daly DS; White AM; Varnum SM; Anderson KK; Zangar RC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():17. PubMed ID: 15673468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size requirements for calibration studies of dietary intake measurements in prospective cohort investigations.
    Kaaks R; Riboli E; van Staveren W
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Sep; 142(5):557-65. PubMed ID: 7677135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical confidence interval calibration for population-level effect estimation studies in observational healthcare data.
    Schuemie MJ; Hripcsak G; Ryan PB; Madigan D; Suchard MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(11):2571-2577. PubMed ID: 29531023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combining Biomarker Calibration Data to Reduce Measurement Error.
    Perkins NJ; Weck J; Mumford SL; Sjaarda LA; Mitchell EM; Pollack AZ; Schisterman EF
    Epidemiology; 2019 Nov; 30 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S3-S9. PubMed ID: 31569147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On using summary statistics from an external calibration sample to correct for covariate measurement error.
    Guo Y; Little RJ; McConnell DS
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):165-74. PubMed ID: 22157312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of batch in the detection, calibration, and quantification of immunoassays in large-scale epidemiologic studies.
    Whitcomb BW; Perkins NJ; Albert PS; Schisterman EF
    Epidemiology; 2010 Jul; 21 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S44-50. PubMed ID: 21422966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calibration of dietary intake measurements in prospective cohort studies.
    Kaaks R; Riboli E; van Staveren W
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Sep; 142(5):548-56. PubMed ID: 7677134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.