430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30569764)
1. Comparison of RPE (Rating of Perceived Exertion) Scales for Session RPE.
Arney BE; Glover R; Fusco A; Cortis C; de Koning JJ; van Erp T; Jaime S; Mikat RP; Porcari JP; Foster C
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2019 Jul; 14(7):994-996. PubMed ID: 30569764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and reliability of the session-RPE method for quantifying training in Australian football: a comparison of the CR10 and CR100 scales.
Scott TJ; Black CR; Quinn J; Coutts AJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Jan; 27(1):270-6. PubMed ID: 22450253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal Robustness of the Session Rating of Perceived Exertion.
Christen J; Foster C; Porcari JP; Mikat RP
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2016 Nov; 11(8):1088-1093. PubMed ID: 26999454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of CR100 Scale for Session Rating of Perceived Exertion in Soccer and Its Interchangeability With the CR10.
Fanchini M; Ferraresi I; Modena R; Schena F; Coutts AJ; Impellizzeri FM
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2016 Apr; 11(3):388-92. PubMed ID: 26309332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A rating of perceived exertion scale using facial expressions for conveying exercise intensity for children and young adults.
Chen YL; Chiou WK; Tzeng YT; Lu CY; Chen SC
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan; 20(1):66-69. PubMed ID: 27267301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 25 Years of Session Rating of Perceived Exertion: Historical Perspective and Development.
Foster C; Boullosa D; McGuigan M; Fusco A; Cortis C; Arney BE; Orton B; Dodge C; Jaime S; Radtke K; van Erp T; de Koning JJ; Bok D; Rodriguez-Marroyo JA; Porcari JP
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2021 May; 16(5):612-621. PubMed ID: 33508782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors That Influence the Rating of Perceived Exertion After Endurance Training.
Roos L; Taube W; Tuch C; Frei KM; Wyss T
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2018 Sep; 13(8):1042-1049. PubMed ID: 29543071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying session ratings of perceived exertion for field-based speed training methods in team sport athletes.
Lockie RG; Murphy AJ; Scott BR; Janse de Jonge XA
J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Oct; 26(10):2721-8. PubMed ID: 22130404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity and Reliability of Facial Rating of Perceived Exertion Scales for Training Load Monitoring.
van der Zwaard S; Hooft Graafland F; van Middelkoop C; Lintmeijer LL
J Strength Cond Res; 2023 May; 37(5):e317-e324. PubMed ID: 36227235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Validation of Session Rating of Perceived Exertion for Quantifying Internal Training Load in Adolescent Distance Runners.
Mann RH; Williams CA; Clift BC; Barker AR
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2019 Mar; 14(3):354-359. PubMed ID: 30160557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Relationships Between Internal and External Measures of Training Load and Intensity in Team Sports: A Meta-Analysis.
McLaren SJ; Macpherson TW; Coutts AJ; Hurst C; Spears IR; Weston M
Sports Med; 2018 Mar; 48(3):641-658. PubMed ID: 29288436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Timing Effect on Training-Session Rating of Perceived Exertion in Top-Class Soccer Referees.
Castagna C; Bizzini M; Póvoas SCA; D'Ottavio S
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2017 Oct; 12(9):1157-1162. PubMed ID: 28121188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internal Training Load Perceived by Athletes and Planned by Coaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Inoue A; Dos Santos Bunn P; do Carmo EC; Lattari E; da Silva EB
Sports Med Open; 2022 Mar; 8(1):35. PubMed ID: 35244801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationships between rating-of-perceived-exertion- and heart-rate-derived internal training load in professional soccer players: a comparison of on-field integrated training sessions.
Campos-Vazquez MA; Mendez-Villanueva A; Gonzalez-Jurado JA; León-Prados JA; Santalla A; Suarez-Arrones L
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2015 Jul; 10(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 25474827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A detailed quantification of differential ratings of perceived exertion during team-sport training.
McLaren SJ; Smith A; Spears IR; Weston M
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Mar; 20(3):290-295. PubMed ID: 27451269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of the session rating of perceived exertion for monitoring exercise demands in youth soccer players.
Rodríguez-Marroyo JA; Antoñan C
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2015 Apr; 10(3):404-7. PubMed ID: 25202917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expanding Knowledge About the Effect of Measurement Time on Session Rating of Perceived Exertion.
Rodríguez-Marroyo JA; Blanco P; Foster C; Villa JG; Carballo-Leyenda B
J Strength Cond Res; 2023 Jan; 37(1):230-233. PubMed ID: 36515611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Subjective Perceived Exertion at the Anaerobic Threshold with the Borg CR-10 Scale.
Zamunér AR; Moreno MA; Camargo TM; Graetz JP; Rebelo AC; Tamburús NY; da Silva E
J Sports Sci Med; 2011; 10(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24149305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of Session Rating of Perceived Exertion Assessed via the CR100 Scale to Track Internal Load in Elite Youth Football Players.
Naidu SA; Fanchini M; Cox A; Smeaton J; Hopkins WG; Serpiello FR
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2019 Mar; 14(3):403-406. PubMed ID: 30204528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Establishing the criterion validity and reliability of common methods for quantifying training load.
Wallace LK; Slattery KM; Impellizzeri FM; Coutts AJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Aug; 28(8):2330-7. PubMed ID: 24662229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
