These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30569984)

  • 1. Cobalt chromium-Titanium rods versus Titanium-Titanium rods for treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; which type of rod has better postoperative outcomes?
    Etemadifar MR; Andalib A; Rahimian A; Nodushan SMHT
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2018 Dec; 64(12):1085-1090. PubMed ID: 30569984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Titanium vs cobalt chromium: what is the best rod material to enhance adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction with sublaminar bands?
    Angelliaume A; Ferrero E; Mazda K; Le Hanneur M; Accabled F; de Gauzy JS; Ilharreborde B
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Jun; 26(6):1732-1738. PubMed ID: 27817137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cobalt-chrome and titanium alloy rods provide similar coronal and sagittal correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Sabah Y; Clément JL; Solla F; Rosello O; Rampal V
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 104(7):1073-1077. PubMed ID: 30193983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Main thoracic curve adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: association of higher rod stiffness and concave-side pedicle screw density with improvement in sagittal thoracic kyphosis restoration.
    Liu H; Li Z; Li S; Zhang K; Yang H; Wang J; Li X; Zheng Z
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 25525960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of surgical correction rates between titanium and cobalt-chrome-alloy as rod materials in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Yang JH; Suh SW; Chang DG
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10053. PubMed ID: 32572073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel scoliosis instrumentation using special superelastic nickel-titanium shape memory rods: a biomechanical analysis using a calibrated computer model and data from a clinical trial.
    Wang X; Yeung K; Cheung JPY; Lau JY; Qi W; Cheung KM; Aubin CE
    Spine Deform; 2020 Jun; 8(3):369-379. PubMed ID: 32096138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic review and meta-analysis for the impact of rod materials and sizes in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Bowden D; Michielli A; Merrill M; Will S
    Spine Deform; 2022 Nov; 10(6):1245-1263. PubMed ID: 35737287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Would CoCr rods provide better correctional forces than stainless steel or titanium for rigid scoliosis curves?
    Serhan H; Mhatre D; Newton P; Giorgio P; Sturm P
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Apr; 26(2):E70-4. PubMed ID: 22832558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved restoration of thoracic kyphosis using a rod construct with differentiated rigidity in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Ohrt-Nissen S; Dragsted C; Dahl B; Ferguson JAI; Gehrchen M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Oct; 43(4):E6. PubMed ID: 28965450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Study Between Cobalt Chrome and Titanium Alloy Rods for Multilevel Spinal Fusion: Proximal Junctional Kyphosis More Frequently Occurred in Patients Having Cobalt Chrome Rods.
    Han S; Hyun SJ; Kim KJ; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Jul; 103():404-409. PubMed ID: 28427980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are There 3D Changes in Spine and Rod Shape in the 2 Years After Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Instrumentation?
    Le Navéaux F; Labelle H; Parent S; Newton PO; Aubin CE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Aug; 42(15):1158-1164. PubMed ID: 28746140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rod stiffness as a risk factor of proximal junctional kyphosis after adult spinal deformity surgery: comparative study between cobalt chrome multiple-rod constructs and titanium alloy two-rod constructs.
    Han S; Hyun SJ; Kim KJ; Jahng TA; Lee S; Rhim SC
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):962-968. PubMed ID: 28242335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of rod diameter on correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at two years follow-up.
    Prince DE; Matsumoto H; Chan CM; Gomez JA; Hyman JE; Roye DP; Vitale MG
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2014 Jan; 34(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 23863413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional analysis of spinal deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of two distinct techniques.
    Sikora-Klak J; Upasani VV; Ilharreborde B; Cross M; Bastrom TP; Mazda K; Yaszay B; Newton PO
    Childs Nerv Syst; 2021 Feb; 37(2):555-560. PubMed ID: 32839853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coupling between sagittal and frontal plane deformity correction in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis and its relationship with postoperative sagittal alignment.
    Luk KD; Vidyadhara S; Lu DS; Wong YW; Cheung WY; Cheung KM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(11):1158-64. PubMed ID: 20118836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative analysis of hook, hybrid, and pedicle screw instrumentation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Yilmaz G; Borkhuu B; Dhawale AA; Oto M; Littleton AG; Mason DE; Gabos PG; Shah SA
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2012; 32(5):490-9. PubMed ID: 22706465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous translation on two rods to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: radiographic results in coronal, sagittal, and transverse plane of a series of 62 patients with a minimum follow-up of two years.
    Clement JL; Chau E; Geoffray A; Vallade MJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):184-92. PubMed ID: 21336234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of implant rod curvature on sagittal correction of scoliosis deformity.
    Salmingo RA; Tadano S; Abe Y; Ito M
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1432-9. PubMed ID: 24275616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between 4.0-mm stainless steel and 4.75-mm titanium alloy single-rod spinal instrumentation for anterior thoracoscopic scoliosis surgery.
    Yoon SH; Ugrinow VL; Upasani VV; Pawelek JB; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2173-8. PubMed ID: 18794758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity.
    Smith JS; Shaffrey E; Klineberg E; Shaffrey CI; Lafage V; Schwab FJ; Protopsaltis T; Scheer JK; Mundis GM; Fu KM; Gupta MC; Hostin R; Deviren V; Kebaish K; Hart R; Burton DC; Line B; Bess S; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):994-1003. PubMed ID: 25325175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.