402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30570459)
1. Why We Should Defend Gene Editing as Eugenics.
Agar N
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2019 Jan; 28(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 30570459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Why Human Germline Editing is More Problematic than Selecting Between Embryos: Ethically Considering Intergenerational Relationships.
Rehmann-Sutter C
New Bioeth; 2018 Apr; 24(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 29529985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Setting ethical limits on human gene editing after the fall of the somatic/germline barrier.
Evans JH
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(22):. PubMed ID: 34050016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is selecting better than modifying? An investigation of arguments against germline gene editing as compared to preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
V Hammerstein AL; Eggel M; Biller-Andorno N
BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 31752935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is morally distinctive about genetic engineering?
Porter J
Hum Gene Ther; 1990; 1(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 2078584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis: contemporary practices in light of the past.
Iltis AS
J Med Ethics; 2016 Jun; 42(6):334-9. PubMed ID: 27161556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Moving Beyond 'Therapy' and 'Enhancement' in the Ethics of Gene Editing.
Cwik B
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2019 Oct; 28(4):695-707. PubMed ID: 31526421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Eugenic sterilization: a discussion of certain legal, medical, and moral aspects of present practices in our public mental institutions.
Birnbaum M
JAMA; 1961 Mar; 175(11):951-8. PubMed ID: 12332119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproductive controls and sexual destiny.
Murphy TF
Bioethics; 1990 Apr; 4(2):121-42. PubMed ID: 11653886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How We Got to CRISPR: The Dilemma of Being Human.
Garland-Thomson R
Perspect Biol Med; 2020; 63(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 32063584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selecting for Disabilities: Selection Versus Modification.
Shaw J
New Bioeth; 2018 Apr; 24(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 29529983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The gene-editing of super-ego.
Hofmann B
Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Sep; 21(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 29667122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gene Editing, the Mystic Threat to Human Dignity.
Raposo VL
J Bioeth Inq; 2019 Jun; 16(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 30887186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An empirically informed critique of Habermas' argument from human nature.
Morar N
Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Feb; 21(1):95-113. PubMed ID: 24446150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eugenics concept: from Plato to present.
Güvercin CH; Arda B
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2008; 14(2):20-6. PubMed ID: 19024333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gene Doping-in Animals? Ethical Issues at the Intersection of Animal Use, Gene Editing, and Sports Ethics.
Neuhaus CP; Parent B
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2019 Jan; 28(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 30570461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In defense of prenatal genetic interventions.
Murphy TF
Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):335-42. PubMed ID: 23025348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Looking into the shadow: the eugenics argument in debates on reproductive technologies and practices.
Cavaliere G
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2018 Dec; 36(1-4):1-22. PubMed ID: 30535862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Who should pay for bad genes?
Rakowski E
Calif Law Rev; 2002 Oct; 90(5):1345-414. PubMed ID: 12436972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Societal and Ethical Impacts of Germline Genome Editing: How Can We Secure Human Rights?
Halpern J; O'Hara SE; Doxzen KW; Witkowsky LB; Owen AL
CRISPR J; 2019 Oct; 2(5):293-298. PubMed ID: 31599687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
