These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30570459)
21. Crowdsourcing the Moral Limits of Human Gene Editing? Juengst ET Hastings Cent Rep; 2017 May; 47(3):15-23. PubMed ID: 28543411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Heritable human genome editing: correction, selection and treatment. Scott R Med Law Rev; 2024 May; 32(2):178-204. PubMed ID: 38513296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Designing babies: morally permissible ways to modify the human genome. Agar N Bioethics; 1995 Jan; 9(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 11653029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Genome Editing: Learning from Its Past and Envisioning Its Future. Sandor J Eur J Health Law; 2022 Apr; 29(3-5):341-358. PubMed ID: 37582545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Guerrilla eugenics: gene drives in heritable human genome editing. Cutter AD J Med Ethics; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37407027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Let Us Assume That Gene Editing is Safe-The Role of Safety Arguments in the Gene Editing Debate. Holm S Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2019 Jan; 28(1):100-111. PubMed ID: 30570469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Embryo Gene Editing is Not Morally Better than Selection Even If Person-Affecting. Rulli T Am J Bioeth; 2024 Aug; 24(8):20-22. PubMed ID: 39158443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Germ-Inating Solutions or Gene-Rating Problems: An Islamic Perspective on Human Germline Gene Editing. Lala I J Relig Health; 2020 Aug; 59(4):1855-1869. PubMed ID: 30778792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. What is morally new in genetic manipulation? Keenan JF Hum Gene Ther; 1990; 1(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 2081195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Wisdom of Germline Editing: An Ethical Analysis of the Use of CRISPR-Cas9 to Edit Human Embryos. Gumer JM New Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 25(2):137-152. PubMed ID: 31130112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes. Cwik B Am J Bioeth; 2020 Aug; 20(8):7-18. PubMed ID: 32757931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reasons, Persons, Eugenics and an Argument in Favour of Gene Editing. Bennett R Am J Bioeth; 2024 Aug; 24(8):37-40. PubMed ID: 39158445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Where Will We Draw the Line? Public Opinions of Human Gene Editing. Riggan KA; Sharp RR; Allyse M Qual Health Res; 2019 Oct; 29(12):1823-1835. PubMed ID: 31057062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Eugenics and its relevance to contemporary health care. Iredale R Nurs Ethics; 2000 May; 7(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 10986944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gene-edited babies: What went wrong and what could go wrong. Wang H; Yang H PLoS Biol; 2019 Apr; 17(4):e3000224. PubMed ID: 31039144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Moderate eugenics and human enhancement. Selgelid MJ Med Health Care Philos; 2014 Feb; 17(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 23728949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report. Gyngell C; Bowman-Smart H; Savulescu J J Med Ethics; 2019 Aug; 45(8):514-523. PubMed ID: 30679191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. On the concept of eugenics: preliminaries to a critical appraisal. Neri D Cad Saude Publica; 1999; 15 Suppl 1():27-34. PubMed ID: 10089545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]