These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30570466)

  • 1. Regulating Genome Editing: For an Enlightened Democratic Governance.
    Cavaliere G; Devolder K; Giubilini A
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2019 Jan; 28(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 30570466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regulating genome editing technologies: a comparison of expert recommendations in the U.K. and in the U.S.A.
    Iacomussi S
    Emerg Top Life Sci; 2019 Nov; 3(6):701-705. PubMed ID: 32915215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Germline Modification and Policymaking: The Relationship between Mitochondrial Replacement and Gene Editing.
    Cussins J; Lowthorp L
    New Bioeth; 2018 Apr; 24(1):74-94. PubMed ID: 29529982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Political Bioethics.
    Gregg B
    J Med Philos; 2022 Nov; 47(4):516-529. PubMed ID: 35512122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Holding the Project Accountable: Research Governance, Ethics, and Democracy.
    Leese M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1597-1616. PubMed ID: 28058620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulating Gene Editing in the Wild: Building Regulatory Capacity to Incorporate Deliberative Democracy.
    Maschke KJ; Gusmano MK
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S42-S47. PubMed ID: 34905250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human genome editing: how to prevent rogue actors.
    Townsend BA
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Oct; 21(1):95. PubMed ID: 33023591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Liberalism, legal moralism and moral disagreement.
    Kuflik A
    J Appl Philos; 2005; 22(2):185-98. PubMed ID: 16220631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Governance of Heritable Human Gene Editing World-Wide and Beyond.
    Xue Y; Shang L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Democratic Governance of Human Germline Genome Editing.
    Jasanoff S; Hurlbut JB; Saha K
    CRISPR J; 2019 Oct; 2(5):266-271. PubMed ID: 31599682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neuroscience and Ethics.
    Liao SM
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 64(2):82-92. PubMed ID: 28497720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why Include the Public in Genome Editing Governance Deliberation?
    Blasimme A
    AMA J Ethics; 2019 Dec; 21(12):E1065-1070. PubMed ID: 31876471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ordo-Responsibility for Germline Gene Editing.
    Ranisch R; Rudolph T; Cremer HJ; Knoepffler N
    CRISPR J; 2020 Feb; 3(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 32091257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human Genome Editing and a Global Socio-bioethics Approach.
    Nie JB
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Nov; 50(6):44-45. PubMed ID: 33315259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Is Prudent Governance of Human Genome Editing?
    Schweikart SJ
    AMA J Ethics; 2019 Dec; 21(12):E1042-1048. PubMed ID: 31876467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome Editing for Involuntary Moral Enhancement.
    Rakić V
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2019 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 30570463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Experts Are Not Enough.
    Hurlbut JB
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 May; 49(3):43-44. PubMed ID: 31269259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Promise and Reality of Public Engagement in the Governance of Human Genome Editing Research.
    Conley JM; Cadigan RJ; Davis AM; Juengst ET; Kuczynski K; Major R; Stancil H; Villa-Palomino J; Waltz M; Henderson GE
    Am J Bioeth; 2023 Jul; 23(7):9-16. PubMed ID: 37204137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods of legitimation: how ethics committees decide which reasons count in public policy decision-making.
    Edwards KT
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Jul; 113():34-41. PubMed ID: 24833251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spain: from the decree to the proposal.
    Gracia D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S29-31. PubMed ID: 11644028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.