179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30570479)
1. Limited efficacy of nontreponemal test combined with treponemal test in the initial syphilis screening algorithm.
Gambiez C; Garet C; Choquet M; Decroix V; Pluquet E; Guiheneuf R; Castelain S
J Med Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 68(2):216-220. PubMed ID: 30570479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of a syphilis testing algorithm using a treponemal test for screening].
Ozbek OA; Doğan Y
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 21341164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2011 Feb; 60(5):133-7. PubMed ID: 21307823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Recent Advances in Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis].
Zarakolu P
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2023 Jan; 57(1):141-155. PubMed ID: 36636853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening for antibodies against Treponema pallidum with chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay: analysis of discordant serology results and clinical characterization.
Li Z; Feng Z; Liu P; Yan C
Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Sep; 53(Pt 5):588-92. PubMed ID: 26680646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of Treponemal Immunoassay Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory Treponemal Testing.
Fakile YF; Jost H; Hoover KW; Gustafson KJ; Novak-Weekley SM; Schapiro JM; Tran A; Chow JM; Park IU
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for syphilis with dual algorithms: analysis of discordant and concordant serology results in a population with a low prevalence of syphilis.
Zhuang YH; Liu H; Tang J; Wang YZ; Zheng XH; Gong Y; Xu XF; Gao X; Lu RQ; Ju SG; Guo L
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2019 Jan; 33(1):178-184. PubMed ID: 30223307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using Treponemal Assay Signal Strength Cutoff Ratios To Predict Syphilis Infection.
Bristow CC; Klausner JD
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of 2 Reverse Syphilis Testing Algorithms in Diagnosis of Syphilis: A Large-Cohort Prospective Study.
Peng J; Lu Y; Yu H; Wu S; Li T; Li H; Deng L; Sun Z
Clin Infect Dis; 2018 Aug; 67(6):947-953. PubMed ID: 30059969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improvement of reverse sequence algorithm for syphilis diagnosis using optimal treponemal screening assay signal-to-cutoff ratio.
Serhir B; Labbé AC; Doualla-Bell F; Simard M; Lambert G; Trudelle A; Longtin J; Tremblay C; Fortin C
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204001. PubMed ID: 30212544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The tale of two serologic tests to screen for syphilis--treponemal and nontreponemal: does the order matter?
Owusu-Edusei K; Koski KA; Ballard RC
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 May; 38(5):448-56. PubMed ID: 21183862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Lumipulse G TP-N Chemiluminescent Immunoassay as a Syphilis Screening Test.
Ortiz DA; Loeffelholz MJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Nov; 55(11):3236-3241. PubMed ID: 28878003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Syphilis testing algorithms using treponemal tests for initial screening--four laboratories, New York City, 2005-2006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2008 Aug; 57(32):872-5. PubMed ID: 18701877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of Treponemal Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis.
Park IU; Fakile YF; Chow JM; Gustafson KJ; Jost H; Schapiro JM; Novak-Weekley S; Tran A; Nomura JH; Chen V; Beheshti M; Tsai T; Hoover K; Bolan G
Clin Infect Dis; 2019 Mar; 68(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29986091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of diagnostic serological results in cases of suspected primary syphilis infection.
Gratzer B; Pohl D; Hotton AL
Sex Transm Dis; 2014 May; 41(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 24722379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance Assessment of Treponemal and Nontreponemal Tests for the Diagnosis of Acquired Syphilis.
Silva ÂAO; Lima AA; Vasconcelos LCM; de Almeida RA; de Freitas NEM; Habib FL; Oliva TA; da Silva MFCR; de Siqueira IC; Santos FLN
Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2024 Jun; 110(6):1237-1244. PubMed ID: 38593786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the serodia Treponema pallidum particle agglutination, the Murex Syphilis ICE and the Enzywell TP tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis.
Aktas G; Young H; Moyes A; Badur S
Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Apr; 16(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 15899082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance Characteristics of the Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithm in a Population With a Moderately High Prevalence of Syphilis.
Rourk AR; Nolte FS; Litwin CM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Nov; 146(5):572-577. PubMed ID: 27773873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consistency Between Treponema pallidum Particle Agglutination Assay and Architect Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay and Characterization of Inconsistent Samples.
Zhiyan L; Meiling W; Ping L; Jinhua D; Zhenlin Y; Zhenru F
J Clin Lab Anal; 2015 Jul; 29(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 24840601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of age, gender, and pregnancy on syphilis screening using the Captia Syphilis-G assay.
Henrich TJ; Yawetz S
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Dec; 38(12):1126-30. PubMed ID: 22082723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]