179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30570479)
21. Use of the INNO-LIA syphilis score assay in the resolution of discordant positive screening enzyme immunoassay results for the serological diagnosis of syphilis.
Lam TK; Lau HY; Lee YP; Fung SM; Leung WL; Kam KM
Int J STD AIDS; 2014 Jan; 25(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 23970631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Challenges of Rapid Plasma Reagin Interpretation in Syphilis Screening in Uganda: Variability in Nontreponemal Results Between Different Laboratories.
Hamill MM; Mbazira KJ; Kiragga AN; Gaydos CA; Jett-Goheen M; Parkes-Ratanshi R; Manabe YC; Nakku-Joloba E; Rompalo A
Sex Transm Dis; 2018 Dec; 45(12):829-833. PubMed ID: 29944643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An evaluation of a novel dual treponemal/nontreponemal point-of-care test for syphilis as a tool to distinguish active from past treated infection.
Causer LM; Kaldor JM; Conway DP; Leslie DE; Denham I; Karapanagiotidis T; Ryan C; Wand H; Anderson DA; Robertson PW; McNulty AM; Donovan B; Fairley CK; Guy RJ
Clin Infect Dis; 2015 Jul; 61(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 25810288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Serological diagnosis of syphilis: a comparison of different diagnostic methods.
Simčič S; Potočnik M
Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat; 2015; 24(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 26086162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Significance of Isolated Reactive Treponemal Enzyme Immunoassay in the Diagnosis of Early Syphilis.
Caswell RJ; Hathorn E; Manavi K
Sex Transm Dis; 2016 Jun; 43(6):365-8. PubMed ID: 27196257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Limited Utility of Reverse Algorithm Syphilis Testing in HIV Clinic Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.
Dionne-Odom J; Van Der Pol B; Boutwell A; Biligowda N; Schmid DG; Hook EW
Sex Transm Dis; 2021 Sep; 48(9):675-679. PubMed ID: 33534407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the Elecsys Syphilis electrochemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line screening test in the reverse algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis.
Lee S; Yu HJ; Lim S; Park H; Kwon MJ; Woo HY
Int J Infect Dis; 2019 Mar; 80():98-104. PubMed ID: 30634041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The discordant results in serum through reverse syphilis screening algorithm].
Dai SQ; Wang JY; Zheng X; Wu XP; Su HK; Xu XH; Zhao QY
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 34(10):1006-9. PubMed ID: 24377997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Economic Assessment of Reverse Algorithm Syphilis Screening in a High Prevalence Population.
Buono SA; Basurto-Davila R; Godwin HA; Green NM
Sex Transm Dis; 2018 Dec; 45(12):834-841. PubMed ID: 29870503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic dilemma of the single screening test used in the diagnosis of syphilis in Nepal.
Dumre SP; Shakya G; Acharya D; Malla S; Adhikari N
Nepal Med Coll J; 2011 Dec; 13(4):238-40. PubMed ID: 23016470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Syphilis detection using the Siemens ADVIA Centaur Syphilis treponemal assay.
Donkers A; Levy HR; Letens-van Vliet A
Clin Chim Acta; 2014 Jun; 433():84-7. PubMed ID: 24513542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Do women with persistently negative nontreponemal test results transmit syphilis during pregnancy?
Peterman TA; Newman DR; Davis D; Su JR
Sex Transm Dis; 2013 Apr; 40(4):311-5. PubMed ID: 23486496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Which algorithm should be used to screen for syphilis?
Binnicker MJ
Curr Opin Infect Dis; 2012 Feb; 25(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 22156894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prevalence of Traditional and Reverse-Algorithm Syphilis Screening in Laboratory Practice: A Survey of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Syphilis Serology Proficiency Testing Program.
Rhoads DD; Genzen JR; Bashleben CP; Faix JD; Ansari MQ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Jan; 141(1):93-97. PubMed ID: 27763779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analysis of 3 algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis and implications for clinical management.
Tong ML; Lin LR; Liu LL; Zhang HL; Huang SJ; Chen YY; Guo XJ; Xi Y; Liu L; Chen FY; Zhang YF; Zhang Q; Yang TC
Clin Infect Dis; 2014 Apr; 58(8):1116-24. PubMed ID: 24550376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Improved reverse screening algorithm for Treponema pallidum antibody using signal-to-cutoff ratios from chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay.
Dai S; Chi P; Lin Y; Zheng X; Liu W; Zhang J; Zeng Q; Wu X; Liu W; Wang J
Sex Transm Dis; 2014 Jan; 41(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 24326578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analytical evaluation of nine serological assays for diagnosis of syphilis.
Malm K; Andersson S; Fredlund H; Norrgren H; Biague A; Månsson F; Ballard R; Unemo M
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2369-76. PubMed ID: 26370737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The management of isolated positive syphilis enzyme immunoassay results in HIV-negative patients attending a sexual health clinic.
Thorley N; Adebayo M; Smit E; Radcliffe K
Int J STD AIDS; 2016 Aug; 27(9):798-800. PubMed ID: 26637236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of automated treponemal and nontreponemal test algorithms as first-line syphilis screening assays.
Huh HJ; Chung JW; Park SY; Chae SL
Ann Lab Med; 2016 Jan; 36(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 26522755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparing three treponemal tests for syphilis screening.
Buono SA; Godwin HA; Green NM
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2017 Nov; 89(3):173-177. PubMed ID: 28844341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
