179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30570479)
41. Going Off Grid: Modeling an Automated Record Search to Process Electronically Reported Reactive Nontreponemal Syphilis Tests.
Matthias J; Keller G; Cha S; Wilson C; Peterman TA
Sex Transm Dis; 2018 Oct; 45(10):655-659. PubMed ID: 29538278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cost-effectiveness of a dual non-treponemal/treponemal syphilis point-of-care test to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa.
Owusu-Edusei K; Gift TL; Ballard RC
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Nov; 38(11):997-1003. PubMed ID: 21992974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Treponema-specific tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis: comparative evaluation of seven assays.
Binnicker MJ; Jespersen DJ; Rollins LO
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Apr; 49(4):1313-7. PubMed ID: 21346050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of the LIAISON chemiluminescence immunoassay for diagnosis of syphilis.
Knight CS; Crum MA; Hardy RW
Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):710-3. PubMed ID: 17460119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Novel point-of-care test for simultaneous detection of nontreponemal and treponemal antibodies in patients with syphilis.
Castro AR; Esfandiari J; Kumar S; Ashton M; Kikkert SE; Park MM; Ballard RC
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Dec; 48(12):4615-9. PubMed ID: 20881177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of Traditional and Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithms in Medical Health Checkups.
Nah EH; Cho S; Kim S; Cho HI; Chai JY
Ann Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 37(6):511-515. PubMed ID: 28840989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of different confirmatory algorithms using seven treponemal tests on Architect Syphilis TP-positive/RPR-negative sera.
Jonckheere S; Berth M; Van Esbroeck M; Blomme S; Lagrou K; Padalko E
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2015 Oct; 34(10):2041-8. PubMed ID: 26187433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Usefulness in clinical practice of a point-of-care rapid test for simultaneous detection of nontreponemal and Treponema pallidum-specific antibodies in patients suffering from documented syphilis.
Guinard J; Prazuck T; Péré H; Poirier C; LeGoff J; Boedec E; Guigon A; Day N; Bélec L
Int J STD AIDS; 2013 Dec; 24(12):944-50. PubMed ID: 23999937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Performance of Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay in Screening for Syphilis in Pregnant Women from Low-Prevalence, Resource-Limited Setting.
Boonchaoy A; Wongchampa P; Hirankarn N; Chaithongwongwatthana S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Feb; 99(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 27249890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of three automated Treponema pallidum antibody assays for syphilis screening.
Xia CS; Yue ZH; Wang H
J Infect Chemother; 2018 Nov; 24(11):887-891. PubMed ID: 30197093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Human immunodeficiency virus infection and syphilis in Hondurian female prostitutes.
Venegas VS; Madrid JP; Lorenzana I; Grillner L; Cosenza H; Bygdeman S
Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 2043701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Establishment of an algorithm for serological testing of syphilis identification].
Karaca Y; Cöplü N; Gözalan A; Oncül O; Akin L; Esen B
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2010 Jan; 44(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 20455397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The tradition algorithm approach underestimates the prevalence of serodiagnosis of syphilis in HIV-infected individuals.
Chen B; Peng X; Xie T; Jin C; Liu F; Wu N
PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2017 Jul; 11(7):e0005758. PubMed ID: 28727773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Preferable procedure for the screening of syphilis in clinical laboratories in China.
Wang KD; Xu DJ; Su JR
Infect Dis (Lond); 2016; 48(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 26313112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Biological false-positive tests comprise a high proportion of Venereal Disease Research Laboratory reactions in an analysis of 300,000 sera.
Geusau A; Kittler H; Hein U; Dangl-Erlach E; Stingl G; Tschachler E
Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Nov; 16(11):722-6. PubMed ID: 16303064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Serologic testing for syphilis in the United States: a cost-effectiveness analysis of two screening algorithms.
Owusu-Edusei K; Peterman TA; Ballard RC
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jan; 38(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20739911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Universal antenatal screening for syphilis: is it still justified economically? A 10-year retrospective analysis.
Kiss H; Widhalm A; Geusau A; Husslein P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Jan; 112(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 14687734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Analysis of positive results in mediace rapid plasma reagin and Treponema pallidum latex agglutination as the automated syphilis test].
Huh HJ; Lee KK; Kim ES; Chae SL
Korean J Lab Med; 2007 Oct; 27(5):324-9. PubMed ID: 18094596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Frequency and Characteristics of Biological False-Positive Test Results for Syphilis Reported in Florida and New York City, USA, 2013 to 2017.
Matthias J; Klingler EJ; Schillinger JA; Keller G; Wilson C; Peterman TA
J Clin Microbiol; 2019 Nov; 57(11):. PubMed ID: 31462551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The Traditional or Reverse Algorithm for Diagnosis of Syphilis: Pros and Cons.
Ortiz DA; Shukla MR; Loeffelholz MJ
Clin Infect Dis; 2020 Jun; 71(Suppl 1):S43-S51. PubMed ID: 32578864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
