These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30570486)

  • 1. Uniting the nations of science.
    Marder E
    Elife; 2018 Dec; 7():. PubMed ID: 30570486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eastern Europe: progress stifled by the old guard.
    Wójcik C
    Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6971):196. PubMed ID: 14724610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supporting diversity in science through social networking.
    Guerrero-Medina G; Feliú-Mójer M; González-Espada W; Díaz-Muñoz G; López M; Díaz-Muñoz SL; Fortis-Santiago Y; Flores-Otero J; Craig D; Colón-Ramos DA
    PLoS Biol; 2013 Dec; 11(12):e1001740. PubMed ID: 24391467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The physician scientist, peer review, and creativity.
    Fusaro RM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1999 May; 40(5 Pt 1):786. PubMed ID: 10321616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FUNDING. A peek at peer review helps young scientists.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2016 Jun; 352(6292):1379. PubMed ID: 27313017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are you a good citizen of science?
    Murphy EJ
    Lipids; 2011 Mar; 46(3):207. PubMed ID: 21409568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rich nations are feeding research predators.
    Vogel L
    CMAJ; 2017 Oct; 189(42):E1322-E1323. PubMed ID: 29061861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protecting our science.
    Seixas NS
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Oct; 57(8):963-5. PubMed ID: 24130260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reviewing in science requires quality criteria and professional reviewers.
    Jurkat-Rott K; Lehmann-Horn F
    Eur J Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 83(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 15202567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The importance of peer review.
    Wheeler HL; Wheeler WB
    J Agric Food Chem; 2006 Nov; 54(24):8983. PubMed ID: 17117781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The surfer wears a suit. A report on the II Symposium on Creativity, Imagination and Interactivity in Science Education.
    Linden R
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2005 Mar; 38(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 15761610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Artworlds-and Scienceworlds?
    Dominiczak MH
    Clin Chem; 2015 Sep; 61(9):1219-21. PubMed ID: 26319457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thinking out of the box.
    J Cell Sci; 2012 Mar; 125(Pt 6):1363-5. PubMed ID: 22662334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Commitment to increase diversity and address unconscious bias.
    Gloviczki P; Lawrence PF
    J Vasc Surg; 2020 Nov; 72(5):1515. PubMed ID: 33011001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guidelines and code of ethics.
    Ghanem AN
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Jul; 21(7):694. PubMed ID: 11500740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The pitfalls and rewards of peer review.
    Lancet; 2008 Feb; 371(9611):447. PubMed ID: 18262020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eyes wide open: reader and author responsibility in understanding the limits of peer review.
    Benson PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2015 Oct; 97(7):487-9. PubMed ID: 26414359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.
    Resnik DB; Elmore SA
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):169-88. PubMed ID: 25633924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior.
    Teixeira da Silva JA; Al-Khatib A; Dobránszki J
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Aug; 23(4):1213-1226. PubMed ID: 27909954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A social-cognitive framework of multidisciplinary team innovation.
    Paletz SB; Schunn CD
    Top Cogn Sci; 2010 Jan; 2(1):73-95. PubMed ID: 25163622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.