121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30571472)
1. What Would You Do With a £30 Million Research Grant?
Avkiran M; Samani NJ
Circ Res; 2018 Nov; 123(11):1196-1198. PubMed ID: 30571472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Who would you share your funding with?
Bollen J
Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7717):143. PubMed ID: 30089925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review reviewed.
Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
Insall R
Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Massive £30-million grant will be awarded to one cardiovascular research team.
Warren M
Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7720):535-536. PubMed ID: 30154541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. NIH plans grant-review overhaul to reduce bias.
Kozlov M
Nature; 2022 Dec; 612(7941):602-603. PubMed ID: 36494447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A unified reviewing format for grant applications and evaluations.
Janke C
EMBO Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):187-188. PubMed ID: 29282217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
Wadman M
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The productivity and impact of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Scholar Program: the apparent positive effect of peer review.
Lichtman MA; Oakes D
Blood Cells Mol Dis; 2001; 27(6):1020-7. PubMed ID: 11831869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Supporting the future.
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):958. PubMed ID: 18563096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. No political interference in US agricultural grants.
Vidaver A
Nature; 2005 Jan; 433(7022):105. PubMed ID: 15650714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research funding: Making the cut.
Powell K
Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7314):383-5. PubMed ID: 20864969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada.
Tamblyn R; Girard N; Qian CJ; Hanley J
CMAJ; 2018 Apr; 190(16):E489-E499. PubMed ID: 29685909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. European Association of Echocardiography: Research Grant Programme.
Gargani L; Muraru D; Badano LP; Lancellotti P; Sicari R;
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jan; 13(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 22130007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EURYI: present procedure risks conflicts of interest.
Lente G
Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7056):192. PubMed ID: 16148909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Financing cardiology research: the British Heart Foundation. Interviews by Robert Short.
Hollins P; Weissberg P; Knapton M
Circulation; 2007 May; 115(18):f85-8. PubMed ID: 17485588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. NIH: Drop re-review for big grant holders.
Roy HK
Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):176. PubMed ID: 23060177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Funding: the research revolution.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):975-6. PubMed ID: 18563124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Grant applications with a result-based orientation.
Krumholz HM
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2013 Sep; 6(5):507-8. PubMed ID: 24021690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Campaign tactics and grants don't mix.
Maojo V; Pazos J; Kulikowski CA
Nature; 2013 May; 497(7450):439. PubMed ID: 23698436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
