BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30573489)

  • 1. Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study.
    Brøgger HA; Maribo T; Christensen R; Schiøttz-Christensen B
    BMJ Open; 2018 Dec; 8(12):e024949. PubMed ID: 30573489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SUcceSS, SUrgery for Spinal Stenosis: protocol of a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
    Anderson DB; Ferreira ML; Harris IA; Davis GA; Stanford R; Beard D; Li Q; Jan S; Mobbs RJ; Maher CG; Yong R; Zammit T; Latimer J; Buchbinder R
    BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e024944. PubMed ID: 30765407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Machado GC; Ferreira PH; Yoo RI; Harris IA; Pinheiro MB; Koes BW; van Tulder MW; Rzewuska M; Maher CG; Ferreira ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 11(11):CD012421. PubMed ID: 27801521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Zaina F; Tomkins-Lane C; Carragee E; Negrini S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jan; 2016(1):CD010264. PubMed ID: 26824399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries.
    Lønne G; Fritzell P; Hägg O; Nordvall D; Gerdhem P; Lagerbäck T; Andersen M; Eiskjaer S; Gehrchen M; Jacobs W; van Hooff ML; Solberg TK
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 29792994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effectiveness of microdecompression and laminectomy for central lumbar spinal stenosis: study protocol for an observational study.
    Nerland US; Jakola AS; Solheim O; Weber C; Rao V; Lønne G; Solberg TK; Salvesen O; Carlsen SM; Nygaard OP; Gulati S
    BMJ Open; 2014 Mar; 4(3):e004651. PubMed ID: 24650809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study.
    Atlas SJ; Keller RB; Wu YA; Deyo RA; Singer DE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(8):936-43. PubMed ID: 15834339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does multilevel lumbar stenosis lead to poorer outcomes?: a subanalysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) lumbar stenosis study.
    Park DK; An HS; Lurie JD; Zhao W; Tosteson A; Tosteson TD; Herkowitz H; Errico T; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):439-46. PubMed ID: 20081560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of preoperative symptom duration on outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry study.
    Cushnie D; Thomas K; Jacobs WB; Cho RKH; Soroceanu A; Ahn H; Attabib N; Bailey CS; Fisher CG; Glennie RA; Hall H; Jarzem P; Johnson MG; Manson NA; Nataraj A; Paquet J; Rampersaud YR; Phan P; Casha S
    Spine J; 2019 Sep; 19(9):1470-1477. PubMed ID: 31121258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
    Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does surgical technique influence clinical outcome after lumbar spinal stenosis decompression? A comparative effectiveness study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Hermansen E; Romild UK; Austevoll IM; Solberg T; Storheim K; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):420-427. PubMed ID: 27262561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with clinical, neurophysiological, laboratory and radiological outcome for surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Uppsala Spinal Stenosis Trial (UppSten).
    Pazarlis K; Punga A; Schizas N; Sandén B; Michaëlsson K; Försth P
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e030578. PubMed ID: 31434781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of spinal decompression on back pain in lumbar spinal stenosis: a Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) study.
    Srinivas S; Paquet J; Bailey C; Nataraj A; Stratton A; Johnson M; Salo P; Christie S; Fisher C; Hall H; Manson N; Rampersaud YR; Thomas K; McIntosh G; Dea N
    Spine J; 2019 Jun; 19(6):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 30664950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design of the Verbiest trial: cost-effectiveness of surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment in patients with lumbar stenosis.
    Overdevest GM; Luijsterburg PA; Brand R; Koes BW; Bierma-Zeinstra SM; Eekhof JA; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Mar; 12():57. PubMed ID: 21371314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study.
    Atlas SJ; Keller RB; Robson D; Deyo RA; Singer DE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Mar; 25(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 10749631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Report of 6-Month Results.
    Staats PS; Benyamin RM;
    Pain Physician; 2016 Feb; 19(2):25-38. PubMed ID: 26815247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.