BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30573684)

  • 1. Inhibition of checkpoint kinase 1 following gemcitabine-mediated S phase arrest results in CDC7- and CDK2-dependent replication catastrophe.
    Warren NJH; Eastman A
    J Biol Chem; 2019 Feb; 294(6):1763-1778. PubMed ID: 30573684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the different mechanisms of cytotoxicity induced by checkpoint kinase I inhibitors when used as single agents or in combination with DNA damage.
    Warren NJH; Eastman A
    Oncogene; 2020 Feb; 39(7):1389-1401. PubMed ID: 31659257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A subset of cancer cell lines is acutely sensitive to the Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776 as monotherapy due to CDK2 activation in S phase.
    Sakurikar N; Thompson R; Montano R; Eastman A
    Oncotarget; 2016 Jan; 7(2):1380-94. PubMed ID: 26595527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution of DNA replication stress marked by high-intensity, pan-nuclear γH2AX staining to chemosensitization by CHK1 and WEE1 inhibitors.
    Parsels LA; Parsels JD; Tanska DM; Maybaum J; Lawrence TS; Morgan MA
    Cell Cycle; 2018; 17(9):1076-1086. PubMed ID: 29895190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chk1 inhibition after replicative stress activates a double strand break response mediated by ATM and DNA-dependent protein kinase.
    McNeely S; Conti C; Sheikh T; Patel H; Zabludoff S; Pommier Y; Schwartz G; Tse A
    Cell Cycle; 2010 Mar; 9(5):995-1004. PubMed ID: 20160494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of cells to ATR and CHK1 inhibitors requires hyperactivation of CDK2 rather than endogenous replication stress or ATM dysfunction.
    Ditano JP; Donahue KL; Tafe LJ; McCleery CF; Eastman A
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):7077. PubMed ID: 33782497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Targeting the replication checkpoint using SCH 900776, a potent and functionally selective CHK1 inhibitor identified via high content screening.
    Guzi TJ; Paruch K; Dwyer MP; Labroli M; Shanahan F; Davis N; Taricani L; Wiswell D; Seghezzi W; Penaflor E; Bhagwat B; Wang W; Gu D; Hsieh Y; Lee S; Liu M; Parry D
    Mol Cancer Ther; 2011 Apr; 10(4):591-602. PubMed ID: 21321066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preclinical development of the novel Chk1 inhibitor SCH900776 in combination with DNA-damaging agents and antimetabolites.
    Montano R; Chung I; Garner KM; Parry D; Eastman A
    Mol Cancer Ther; 2012 Feb; 11(2):427-38. PubMed ID: 22203733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The CHK1 inhibitor MU380 significantly increases the sensitivity of human docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer cells to gemcitabine through the induction of mitotic catastrophe.
    Drápela S; Khirsariya P; van Weerden WM; Fedr R; Suchánková T; Búzová D; Červený J; Hampl A; Puhr M; Watson WR; Culig Z; Krejčí L; Paruch K; Souček K
    Mol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 14(10):2487-2503. PubMed ID: 32579780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential Sensitivity to CDK2 Inhibition Discriminates the Molecular Mechanisms of CHK1 Inhibitors as Monotherapy or in Combination with the Topoisomerase I Inhibitor SN38.
    Warren NJH; Donahue KL; Eastman A
    ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci; 2019 Jun; 2(3):168-182. PubMed ID: 32259055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ATR inhibition broadly sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapy independent of BRCA status.
    Huntoon CJ; Flatten KS; Wahner Hendrickson AE; Huehls AM; Sutor SL; Kaufmann SH; Karnitz LM
    Cancer Res; 2013 Jun; 73(12):3683-91. PubMed ID: 23548269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanistic Distinctions between CHK1 and WEE1 Inhibition Guide the Scheduling of Triple Therapy with Gemcitabine.
    Koh SB; Wallez Y; Dunlop CR; Bernaldo de Quirós Fernández S; Bapiro TE; Richards FM; Jodrell DI
    Cancer Res; 2018 Jun; 78(11):3054-3066. PubMed ID: 29735549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. LY2606368 Causes Replication Catastrophe and Antitumor Effects through CHK1-Dependent Mechanisms.
    King C; Diaz HB; McNeely S; Barnard D; Dempsey J; Blosser W; Beckmann R; Barda D; Marshall MS
    Mol Cancer Ther; 2015 Sep; 14(9):2004-13. PubMed ID: 26141948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MMB-FOXM1-driven premature mitosis is required for CHK1 inhibitor sensitivity.
    Branigan TB; Kozono D; Schade AE; Deraska P; Rivas HG; Sambel L; Reavis HD; Shapiro GI; D'Andrea AD; DeCaprio JA
    Cell Rep; 2021 Mar; 34(9):108808. PubMed ID: 33657372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition of the ATR-CHK1 Pathway in Ewing Sarcoma Cells Causes DNA Damage and Apoptosis via the CDK2-Mediated Degradation of RRM2.
    Koppenhafer SL; Goss KL; Terry WW; Gordon DJ
    Mol Cancer Res; 2020 Jan; 18(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 31649026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combination drug scheduling defines a "window of opportunity" for chemopotentiation of gemcitabine by an orally bioavailable, selective ChK1 inhibitor, GNE-900.
    Blackwood E; Epler J; Yen I; Flagella M; O'Brien T; Evangelista M; Schmidt S; Xiao Y; Choi J; Kowanetz K; Ramiscal J; Wong K; Jakubiak D; Yee S; Cain G; Gazzard L; Williams K; Halladay J; Jackson PK; Malek S
    Mol Cancer Ther; 2013 Oct; 12(10):1968-80. PubMed ID: 23873850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chk1 inhibition in p53-deficient cell lines drives rapid chromosome fragmentation followed by caspase-independent cell death.
    Del Nagro CJ; Choi J; Xiao Y; Rangell L; Mohan S; Pandita A; Zha J; Jackson PK; O'Brien T
    Cell Cycle; 2014; 13(2):303-14. PubMed ID: 24247149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined inhibition of Wee1 and Chk1 gives synergistic DNA damage in S-phase due to distinct regulation of CDK activity and CDC45 loading.
    Hauge S; Naucke C; Hasvold G; Joel M; Rødland GE; Juzenas P; Stokke T; Syljuåsen RG
    Oncotarget; 2017 Feb; 8(7):10966-10979. PubMed ID: 28030798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cdk1 uncouples CtIP-dependent resection and Rad51 filament formation during M-phase double-strand break repair.
    Peterson SE; Li Y; Chait BT; Gottesman ME; Baer R; Gautier J
    J Cell Biol; 2011 Sep; 194(5):705-20. PubMed ID: 21893598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. H2AX phosphorylation marks gemcitabine-induced stalled replication forks and their collapse upon S-phase checkpoint abrogation.
    Ewald B; Sampath D; Plunkett W
    Mol Cancer Ther; 2007 Apr; 6(4):1239-48. PubMed ID: 17406032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.