BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30573747)

  • 1. Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults is Time-sensitive Towards Positive Outcome: Prediction using Advanced Machine Learning Techniques.
    Kim H; Kang WS; Park HJ; Lee JY; Park JW; Kim Y; Seo JW; Kwak MY; Kang BC; Yang CJ; Duffy BA; Cho YS; Lee SY; Suh MW; Moon IJ; Ahn JH; Cho YS; Oh SH; Chung JW
    Sci Rep; 2018 Dec; 8(1):18004. PubMed ID: 30573747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.
    Holden LK; Finley CC; Firszt JB; Holden TA; Brenner C; Potts LG; Gotter BD; Vanderhoof SS; Mispagel K; Heydebrand G; Skinner MW
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):342-60. PubMed ID: 23348845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postlingually deaf adults of all ages derive equal benefits from unilateral multichannel cochlear implant.
    Park E; Shipp DB; Chen JM; Nedzelski JM; Lin VY
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(10):637-43. PubMed ID: 22212763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?
    Capretta NR; Moberly AC
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Mar; 126(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 26256441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical reorganization following auditory deprivation predicts cochlear implant performance in postlingually deaf adults.
    Sun Z; Seo JW; Park HJ; Lee JY; Kwak MY; Kim Y; Lee JY; Park JW; Kang WS; Ahn JH; Chung JW; Kim H
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Jan; 42(1):233-244. PubMed ID: 33022826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of residual speech and auditory deprivation on speech perception of adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Derinsu U; Yüksel M; Geçici CR; Çiprut A; Akdeniz E
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Feb; 46(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 29945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model.
    Bond M; Mealing S; Anderson R; Elston J; Weiner G; Taylor RS; Hoyle M; Liu Z; Price A; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Sep; 13(44):1-330. PubMed ID: 19799825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults.
    Rousset A; Dowell R; Leigh J
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S24-30. PubMed ID: 27160793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of various factors on the performance of repetition tests in adults with cochlear implants.
    Moon IJ; Kim EY; Jeong JO; Chung WH; Cho YS; Hong SH
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 269(3):739-45. PubMed ID: 21739091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period.
    Oh SH; Kim CS; Kang EJ; Lee DS; Lee HJ; Chang SO; Ahn SH; Hwang CH; Park HJ; Koo JW
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 12701730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation.
    Finke M; Strauß-Schier A; Kludt E; Büchner A; Illg A
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():112-119. PubMed ID: 28286233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech recognition and quality of life outcomes of adults with cochlear implants following a quarter-century of deafness: what should be the maximum duration?
    Atak HBO; Sennaroglu G; Sennaroglu L
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Nov; 280(11):4903-4913. PubMed ID: 37672104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear Implants in Adults: Effects of Age and Duration of Deafness on Speech Recognition.
    Beyea JA; McMullen KP; Harris MS; Houston DM; Martin JM; Bolster VA; Adunka OF; Moberly AC
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):1238-45. PubMed ID: 27466894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting sequential bilateral cochlear implantation performance in postlingually deafened adults; A retrospective cohort study.
    Smulders YE; Hendriks T; Stegeman I; Eikelboom RH; Sucher C; Upson G; Chester Browne R; Jayakody D; Santa Maria PL; Atlas MD; Friedland PL
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 43(6):1500-1507. PubMed ID: 30022607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance Plateau in Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Cusumano C; Friedmann DR; Fang Y; Wang B; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):334-338. PubMed ID: 28166183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive models for cochlear implant outcomes: Performance, generalizability, and the impact of cohort size.
    Shafieibavani E; Goudey B; Kiral I; Zhong P; Jimeno-Yepes A; Swan A; Gambhir M; Buechner A; Kludt E; Eikelboom RH; Sucher C; Gifford RH; Rottier R; Plant K; Anjomshoa H
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211066174. PubMed ID: 34903103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance.
    Friedland DR; Venick HS; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jul; 24(4):582-9. PubMed ID: 12851549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults I: theory and measures of effectiveness.
    UK Cochlear Implant Study Group
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):310-35. PubMed ID: 15292774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria.
    Rubinstein JT; Parkinson WS; Tyler RS; Gantz BJ
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 10431885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of long-term deafness on speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult CLARION cochlear implant users.
    Geier L; Barker M; Fisher L; Opie J
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1999 Apr; 177():80-3. PubMed ID: 10214807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.