These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30573933)

  • 1. Multilevel Modeling of Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment: The Multilevel DINA Example.
    Wang WC; Qiu XL
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jan; 43(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 30573933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive Diagnostic Models for Random Guessing Behaviors.
    Hsu CL; Jin KY; Chiu MM
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():570365. PubMed ID: 33101139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A classification model for continuous responses: Identifying risk perception groups on health-related activities.
    de Oliveira ESB; Wang X; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2023 Apr; 65(4):e2100222. PubMed ID: 36782079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient Models for Cognitive Diagnosis With Continuous and Mixed-Type Latent Variables.
    Hong H; Wang C; Lim YS; Douglas J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jan; 39(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 29880992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.
    da Silva MA; de Oliveira ESB; von Davier AA; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):352-368. PubMed ID: 29194715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Sequential Process Model for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment With Repeated Attempts.
    Hung SP; Huang HY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):495-511. PubMed ID: 31534286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive Diagnostic Models for Rater Effects.
    Li X; Wang WC; Xie Q
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():525. PubMed ID: 32265810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian DINA Modeling Incorporating Within-Item Characteristic Dependency.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao M; Bian Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Mar; 43(2):143-158. PubMed ID: 30792561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research on the Cognitive Diagnosis of Chinese Listening Comprehension Ability Based on the G-DINA Model.
    Li L; An Y; Ren J; Wei X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714568. PubMed ID: 34557134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating CDMs Using the Slice-Within-Gibbs Sampler.
    Xu X; de la Torre J; Zhang J; Guo J; Shi N
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2260. PubMed ID: 33101108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ignoring a Multilevel Structure in Mixture Item Response Models: Impact on Parameter Recovery and Model Selection.
    Lee WY; Cho SJ; Sterba SK
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Mar; 42(2):136-154. PubMed ID: 29882542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining Parameter Invariance in a General Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Ravand H; Baghaei P; Doebler P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2930. PubMed ID: 31998189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the Link between Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Knowledge Space Theory.
    Heller J; Stefanutti L; Anselmi P; Robusto E
    Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):995-1019. PubMed ID: 25838246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Kim JK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Data.
    Yigit HD; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jul; 43(5):388-401. PubMed ID: 31235984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation approaches in cognitive diagnosis modeling when attributes are hierarchically structured.
    Akbay L; de la Torre J
    Psicothema; 2020 Feb; 32(1):122-129. PubMed ID: 31954425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):142-163. PubMed ID: 30723890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Model Similarity, Model Selection, and Attribute Classification.
    Ma W; Iaconangelo C; de la Torre J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 May; 40(3):200-217. PubMed ID: 29881048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.