These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30574851)

  • 1. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention of the LAD: costs and long-term outcome.
    Merkle J; Zeriouh M; Sabashnikov A; Azizov F; Hohmann C; Weber C; Eghbalzadeh K; Said Y; Wahlers T; Michels G
    Perfusion; 2019 May; 34(4):323-329. PubMed ID: 30574851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting for proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.
    Reeves BC; Angelini GD; Bryan AJ; Taylor FC; Cripps T; Spyt TJ; Samani NJ; Roberts JA; Jacklin P; Seehra HK; Culliford LA; Keenan DJ; Rowlands DJ; Clarke B; Stanbridge R; Foale R
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Apr; 8(16):1-43. PubMed ID: 15080865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is the optimal revascularization technique for isolated disease of the left anterior descending artery: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention?
    Patel AJ; Yates MT; Soppa GK
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Jul; 19(1):144-8. PubMed ID: 24667582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on outcome after isolated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery.
    Lichtenberg A; Klima U; Paeschke H; Pichlmaier M; Ringes-Lichtenberg S; Walles T; Goerler H; Haverich A
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Aug; 78(2):487-91. PubMed ID: 15276503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrated minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting and angioplasty for coronary artery revascularization.
    Cisowski M; Morawski W; Drzewiecki J; Kruczak W; Toczek K; Bis J; Bochenek A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2002 Aug; 22(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 12142196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass compared with percutaneous coronary intervention for left anterior descending artery disease: a meta-analysis.
    Wang XW; Qu C; Huang C; Xiang XY; Lu ZQ
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 11(1):125. PubMed ID: 27491539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of sirolimus-eluting stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery: 7-year follow-up of a randomized trial.
    Blazek S; Rossbach C; Borger MA; Fuernau G; Desch S; Eitel I; Stiermaier T; Lurz P; Holzhey D; Schuler G; Mohr FW; Thiele H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):30-8. PubMed ID: 25499302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost and Outcome of Minimally Invasive Techniques for Coronary Surgery Using Robotic Technology.
    Pasrija C; Kon ZN; Ghoreishi M; Lehr EJ; Gammie JS; Griffith BP; Bonatti J; Taylor BS
    Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(4):282-286. PubMed ID: 30130263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propensity Score Adjusted Comparison of MIDCAB Versus Full Sternotomy Left Anterior Descending Artery Revascularization.
    Raja SG; Benedetto U; Alkizwini E; Gupta S; Amrani M;
    Innovations (Phila); 2015; 10(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 26181582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass after percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Shi X; Zhu P; Ling Y; Xue B; Liu J
    J Card Surg; 2022 Apr; 37(4):795-800. PubMed ID: 35106840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting versus stenting for patients with proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease.
    Shirai K; Lansky AJ; Mehran R; Dangas GD; Costantini CO; Fahy M; Slack S; Mintz GS; Stone GW; Leon MB
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Apr; 93(8):959-62. PubMed ID: 15081435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determinants of late outcome after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass.
    Pompilio G; Alamanni F; Tartara PM; Antona C; Porqueddu M; Veglia F; Biglioli P
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2007 Apr; 48(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 17410069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass improves late survival compared with drug-eluting stents in isolated proximal left anterior descending artery disease: a 10-year follow-up, single-center, propensity score analysis.
    Benedetto U; Raja SG; Soliman RF; Albanese A; Jothidasan A; Ilsley CD; Amrani M;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Oct; 148(4):1316-22. PubMed ID: 24521955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of diabetes on outcome following isolated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery.
    Lichtenberg A; Klima U; Paeschke H; Pichlmaier M; Ringes-Lichtenberg S; Walles T; Goerler H; Haverich A
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jul; 78(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 15223417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is there an optimal minimally invasive technique for left anterior descending coronary artery bypass?
    Jegaden O; Wautot F; Sassard T; Szymanik I; Shafy A; Lapeze J; Farhat F
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Mar; 6():37. PubMed ID: 21439055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hybrid revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease.
    Repossini A; Tespili M; Saino A; Kotelnikov I; Moggi A; Di Bacco L; Muneretto C
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Aug; 44(2):288-93; discussion 293-4. PubMed ID: 23444407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in the era of percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Raffa GM; Malvindi PG; Ornaghi D; Citterio E; Cappai A; Basciu A; Barbone A; Fossati F; Tarelli G; Settepani F
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2015 Feb; 16(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 23877205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting decreases hospital stay and cost.
    King RC; Reece TB; Hurst JL; Shockey KS; Tribble CG; Spotnitz WD; Kron IL
    Ann Surg; 1997 Jun; 225(6):805-9; discussion 809-11. PubMed ID: 9230821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The revival of surgical treatment for isolated proximal high grade LAD lesions by minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Diegeler A; Spyrantis N; Matin M; Falk V; Hambrecht R; Autschbach R; Mohr FW; Schuler G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2000 May; 17(5):501-4. PubMed ID: 10814909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation vs. minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) in patients with left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis.
    Hong SJ; Lim DS; Seo HS; Kim YH; Shim WJ; Park CG; Oh DJ; Ro YM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Jan; 64(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 15619278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.