360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30575092)
21. The influence of students' prior clinical skills and context characteristics on mini-CEX scores in clerkships--a multilevel analysis.
Rogausch A; Beyeler C; Montagne S; Jucker-Kupper P; Berendonk C; Huwendiek S; Gemperli A; Himmel W
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Nov; 15():208. PubMed ID: 26608836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Experiences of using an OSCE protocol in clinical examinations of nursing students - A comparison of student and faculty assessments.
Lyngå P; Masiello I; Karlgren K; Joelsson-Alm E
Nurse Educ Pract; 2019 Feb; 35():130-134. PubMed ID: 30802783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The sights and insights of examiners in objective structured clinical examinations.
Chong L; Taylor S; Haywood M; Adelstein BA; Shulruf B
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():34. PubMed ID: 29278906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pass/fail decisions and standards: the impact of differential examiner stringency on OSCE outcomes.
Homer M
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2022 May; 27(2):457-473. PubMed ID: 35230590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Examiner fatigue in communication skills objective structured clinical examinations.
Humphris GM; Kaney S
Med Educ; 2001 May; 35(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 11328514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Video Recording in Veterinary Medicine OSCEs: Feasibility and Inter-rater Agreement between Live Performance Examiners and Video Recording Reviewing Examiners.
Tan JY; Ma IWY; Hunt JA; Kwong GPS; Farrell R; Bell C; Read EK
J Vet Med Educ; 2021 Aug; 48(4):485-491. PubMed ID: 32758091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Medical students review of formative OSCE scores, checklists, and videos improves with student-faculty debriefing meetings.
Bernard AW; Ceccolini G; Feinn R; Rockfeld J; Rosenberg I; Thomas L; Cassese T
Med Educ Online; 2017; 22(1):1324718. PubMed ID: 28521646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Scoring objective structured clinical examinations using video monitors or video recordings.
Sturpe DA; Huynh D; Haines ST
Am J Pharm Educ; 2010 Apr; 74(3):44. PubMed ID: 20498737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. "On the same page"? The effect of GP examiner feedback on differences in rating severity in clinical assessments: a pre/post intervention study.
Sturman N; Ostini R; Wong WY; Zhang J; David M
BMC Med Educ; 2017 Jun; 17(1):101. PubMed ID: 28587597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The objective structured clinical examination: can physician-examiners participate from a distance?
Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh DM; Su C; Wood T
Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 24606627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Exploring the introduction of entrustment rating scales in an existing objective structured clinical examination.
Holzhausen Y; Maaz A; März M; Sehy V; Peters H
BMC Med Educ; 2019 Aug; 19(1):319. PubMed ID: 31438938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Borderline grades in high stakes clinical examinations: resolving examiner uncertainty.
Shulruf B; Adelstein BA; Damodaran A; Harris P; Kennedy S; O'Sullivan A; Taylor S
BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):272. PubMed ID: 30458741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The consistency and uncertainty in examiners' definitions of pass/fail performance on OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) stations.
Rothman AI; Blackmore D; Cohen R; Reznick R
Eval Health Prof; 1996 Mar; 19(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 10186899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Examiner effect on the objective structured clinical exam - a study at five medical schools.
Schleicher I; Leitner K; Juenger J; Moeltner A; Ruesseler M; Bender B; Sterz J; Schuettler KF; Koenig S; Kreuder JG
BMC Med Educ; 2017 Apr; 17(1):71. PubMed ID: 28438196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. "Shadow" OSCE examiner. A cross-sectional study comparing the "shadow" examiner with the original OSCE examiner format.
Rodrigues MAV; Olmos RD; Kira CM; Lotufo PA; Santos IS; Tibério IFLC
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2019; 74():e1502. PubMed ID: 31721909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does Changing Examiner Stations During UK Postgraduate Surgery Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Influence Examination Reliability and Candidates' Scores?
Brennan PA; Croke DT; Reed M; Smith L; Munro E; Foulkes J; Arnett R
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 26923102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Is There Variability in Scoring of Student Surgical OSCE Performance Based on Examiner Experience and Expertise?
Donohoe CL; Reilly F; Donnelly S; Cahill RA
J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(5):1202-1210. PubMed ID: 32336628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Examiner seniority and experience are associated with bias when scoring communication, but not examination, skills in objective structured clinical examinations in Australia.
Chong L; Taylor S; Haywood M; Adelstein BA; Shulruf B
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():17. PubMed ID: 30016854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A randomised controlled pilot trial of the influence of non-native English accents on examiners' scores in OSCEs.
Kozato A; Patel N; Shikino K
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Aug; 20(1):268. PubMed ID: 32799871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessing musculoskeletal examination skills and diagnostic reasoning of 4th year medical students using a novel objective structured clinical exam.
Stansfield RB; Diponio L; Craig C; Zeller J; Chadd E; Miller J; Monrad S
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):268. PubMed ID: 27741946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
