These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30575167)

  • 21. Analytical and statistical consideration on the use of the ISAG-ICAR-SNP bovine panel for parentage control, using the Illumina BeadChip technology: example on the German Holstein population.
    Schütz E; Brenig B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):3. PubMed ID: 25651826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effectiveness of microsatellite and SNP markers for parentage and identity analysis in species with low genetic diversity: the case of European bison.
    Tokarska M; Marshall T; Kowalczyk R; Wójcik JM; Pertoldi C; Kristensen TN; Loeschcke V; Gregersen VR; Bendixen C
    Heredity (Edinb); 2009 Oct; 103(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 19623210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Population genetic inferences using immune gene SNPs mirror patterns inferred by microsatellites.
    Elbers JP; Clostio RW; Taylor SS
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 May; 17(3):481-491. PubMed ID: 27488693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimation of migration rates from marker-based parentage analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Jul; 23(13):3191-213. PubMed ID: 24863365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microsatellite primer development in elasmobranchs using next generation sequencing of enriched libraries.
    Feldheim KA; Jabado RW; Chapman DD; Cardeñosa D; Maddox JD
    Mol Biol Rep; 2020 Apr; 47(4):2669-2675. PubMed ID: 32130617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference.
    Anderson EC; Garza JC
    Genetics; 2006 Apr; 172(4):2567-82. PubMed ID: 16387880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How many markers are enough? Factors influencing parentage testing in different livestock populations.
    Strucken EM; Lee SH; Lee HK; Song KD; Gibson JP; Gondro C
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Feb; 133(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 26234440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parentage and sibship inference from markers in polyploids.
    Wang J; Scribner KT
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 May; 14(3):541-53. PubMed ID: 24299450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Single nucleotide polymorphisms for pig identification and parentage exclusion.
    Rohrer GA; Freking BA; Nonneman D
    Anim Genet; 2007 Jun; 38(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 17433014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A high throughput single nucleotide polymorphism multiplex assay for parentage assignment in New Zealand sheep.
    Clarke SM; Henry HM; Dodds KG; Jowett TW; Manley TR; Anderson RM; McEwan JC
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93392. PubMed ID: 24740141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using blocks of linked single nucleotide polymorphisms as highly polymorphic genetic markers for parentage analysis.
    Jones B; Walsh D; Werner L; Fiumera A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2009 Mar; 9(2):487-97. PubMed ID: 21564678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. More affordable and effective noninvasive single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using high-throughput amplicon sequencing.
    Eriksson CE; Ruprecht J; Levi T
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Nov; 20(6):1505-1516. PubMed ID: 32521101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of microsatellites and parentage testing in saltwater crocodiles.
    Isberg SR; Chen Y; Barker SG; Moran C
    J Hered; 2004; 95(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 15388772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of genotyping by sequencing data to develop a high-throughput and multifunctional SNP panel for conservation applications in Pacific lamprey.
    Hess JE; Campbell NR; Docker MF; Baker C; Jackson A; Lampman R; McIlraith B; Moser ML; Statler DP; Young WP; Wildbill AJ; Narum SR
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jan; 15(1):187-202. PubMed ID: 24842551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.
    Jones AG; Ardren WR
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Oct; 12(10):2511-23. PubMed ID: 12969458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Power of exclusion of 19 microsatellite markers for parentage testing in river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis).
    Kathiravan P; Kataria RS; Mishra BP
    Mol Biol Rep; 2012 Aug; 39(8):8217-23. PubMed ID: 22555978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pedigree reconstruction from SNP data: parentage assignment, sibship clustering and beyond.
    Huisman J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Sep; 17(5):1009-1024. PubMed ID: 28271620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exclusion and Genomic Relatedness Methods for Assignment of Parentage Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data.
    Dodds KG; McEwan JC; Brauning R; van Stijn TC; Rowe SJ; McEwan KM; Clarke SM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Oct; 9(10):3239-3247. PubMed ID: 31383721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimating genomic diversity and population differentiation - an empirical comparison of microsatellite and SNP variation in Arabidopsis halleri.
    Fischer MC; Rellstab C; Leuzinger M; Roumet M; Gugerli F; Shimizu KK; Holderegger R; Widmer A
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):69. PubMed ID: 28077077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mining and Development of Novel SSR Markers Using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Data in Plants.
    Taheri S; Lee Abdullah T; Yusop MR; Hanafi MM; Sahebi M; Azizi P; Shamshiri RR
    Molecules; 2018 Feb; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 29438290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.