105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30575290)
1. Predicting ulcer-free survival using the discriminative value of screening test locations.
Rinkel WD; van der Oest MJW; Dijkstra DA; Castro Cabezas M; Coert JH
Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2019 Mar; 35(3):e3119. PubMed ID: 30575290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the monofilament with other testing modalities for foot ulcer susceptibility.
Miranda-Palma B; Sosenko JM; Bowker JH; Mizel MS; Boulton AJ
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 70(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 16126117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Neuropad test for sudomotor function to predict the risk of diabetic foot ulceration].
Qin Y; Cao Y; Gao F; Luo X; Li J; Fu X; Xue Y
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2014 Apr; 34(4):560-2. PubMed ID: 24752109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An alternative to a 10-g monofilament or tuning fork? Two new, simple, easy-to-use screening tests for determining foot ulcer risk in people with diabetes.
Baker N
Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1477-9. PubMed ID: 22686252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors associated with diabetic foot ulcer-free survival in patients with diabetes.
Yazdanpanah L; Shahbazian H; Nazari I; Hesam S; Ahmadi F; Cheraghian B; Arti HR; Mohammadianinejad SE
Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2018 Nov; 12(6):1039-1043. PubMed ID: 30168426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 4.5-gram monofilament sensation beneath both first metatarsal heads indicates protective foot sensation in diabetic patients.
Saltzman CL; Rashid R; Hayes A; Fellner C; Fitzpatrick D; Klapach A; Frantz R; Hillis SL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):717-23. PubMed ID: 15069135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between monofilament, tuning fork and vibration perception tests for screening patients at risk of foot complication.
Gin H; Rigalleau V; Baillet L; Rabemanantsoa C
Diabetes Metab; 2002 Dec; 28(6 Pt 1):457-61. PubMed ID: 12522325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dryness of Foot Skin Assessed by the Visual Indicator Test and Risk of Diabetic Foot Ulceration: A Prospective Observational Study.
Panagoulias GS; Eleftheriadou I; Papanas N; Manes C; Kamenov Z; Tesic D; Bousboulas S; Tentolouris A; Jude EB; Tentolouris N
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2020; 11():625. PubMed ID: 33013702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The utility of Vibratip in accurate identification of loss of protective sensation in the contralateral foot of patients admitted with a diabetic foot ulcer.
Pasangha E; George B; Jayalakshmi V; Devi P; Ayyar V; Bantwal G
Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2021; 15(3):857-862. PubMed ID: 33873055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new application of the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study Test Battery: grading pedal sensory loss to predict the risk of foot ulceration.
Rinkel WD; Castro Cabezas M; Coert JH
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2021 May; 175():108836. PubMed ID: 33901623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Item reduction of the 39-item Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study Test Battery using decision tree modelling.
Rinkel WD; van der Oest MJW; Coert JH
Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2020 May; 36(4):e3291. PubMed ID: 31955486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mobile phone generated vibrations used to detect diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
May JD; Morris MWJ
Foot Ankle Surg; 2017 Dec; 23(4):281-284. PubMed ID: 29202988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined Utility of the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament and the Timed Vibration Test in the Prediction of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
O'Brien T; Karem J
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2022 Mar; 112(1):. PubMed ID: 36458996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can plantar soft tissue mechanics enhance prognosis of diabetic foot ulcer?
Naemi R; Chatzistergos P; Suresh S; Sundar L; Chockalingam N; Ramachandran A
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 126():182-191. PubMed ID: 28259007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination for diabetic peripheral neuropathy screening.
Kamei N; Yamane K; Nakanishi S; Yamashita Y; Tamura T; Ohshita K; Watanabe H; Fujikawa R; Okubo M; Kohno N
J Diabetes Complications; 2005; 19(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15642490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure as a predictor for short-term survival in patients with type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers: a comparison with ankle-brachial index and toe blood pressure.
Fagher K; Katzman P; Löndahl M
Acta Diabetol; 2018 Aug; 55(8):781-788. PubMed ID: 29707757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Invasive Systemic Infection After Hospital Treatment for Diabetic Foot Ulcer: Risk of Occurrence and Effect on Survival.
Chen SY; Giurini JM; Karchmer AW
Clin Infect Dis; 2017 Feb; 64(3):326-334. PubMed ID: 28013263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation and comparison of currently available stratification systems for patients with diabetes by risk of foot ulcer development.
Monteiro-Soares M; Vaz-Carneiro A; Sampaio S; Dinis-Ribeiro M
Eur J Endocrinol; 2012 Sep; 167(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 22740504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Traditional Methods versus Quantitative Sensory Testing of the Feet at Risk: Results from the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study.
Rinkel WD; Castro Cabezas M; Setyo JH; Van Neck JW; Coert JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Mar; 139(3):752e-763e. PubMed ID: 28234858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The tuning fork and the at-risk foot.
Hitman GA
Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1477. PubMed ID: 23151034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
