These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30575630)

  • 1. The Impact of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections on Postcardiac Transplant Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Chahal D; Sepehry AA; Nazzari H; Wright AJ; Toma M
    ASAIO J; 2019; 65(8):827-836. PubMed ID: 30575630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.
    John R; Pagani FD; Naka Y; Boyle A; Conte JV; Russell SD; Klodell CT; Milano CA; Rogers J; Farrar DJ; Frazier OH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 140(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 20447659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does continuous flow left ventricular assist device technology have a positive impact on outcome pretransplant and posttransplant?
    Klotz S; Stypmann J; Welp H; Schmid C; Drees G; Rukosujew A; Scheld HH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Nov; 82(5):1774-8. PubMed ID: 17062246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infectious complications in patients with left ventricular assist device: etiology and outcomes in the continuous-flow era.
    Topkara VK; Kondareddy S; Malik F; Wang IW; Mann DL; Ewald GA; Moazami N
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Oct; 90(4):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20868826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices for end-stage heart failure: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Clegg AJ; Scott DA; Loveman E; Colquitt J; Hutchinson J; Royle P; Bryant J
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Nov; 9(45):1-132, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16303098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporary left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to heart transplantation.
    Seese L; Hickey G; Keebler ME; Mathier MA; Sultan I; Gleason TG; Wang Y; Kilic A
    J Card Surg; 2020 Apr; 35(4):810-817. PubMed ID: 32092194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support and posttransplantation outcomes: A new challenge.
    Fukuhara S; Takeda K; Polanco AR; Takayama H; Naka Y
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Mar; 151(3):872-880.e5. PubMed ID: 26896362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of age on outcomes following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.
    Lushaj EB; Badami A; Osaki S; Murray M; Leverson G; Lozonschi L; Akhter S; Kohmoto T
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 25770085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transplant Outcomes in Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.
    Miller RJH; Moayedi Y; Sharma A; Haddad F; Hiesinger W; Banerjee D
    ASAIO J; 2020 Apr; 66(4):394-398. PubMed ID: 31192848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome of cardiac transplantation in patients requiring prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support.
    Takeda K; Takayama H; Kalesan B; Uriel N; Colombo PC; Jorde UP; Yuzefpolskaya M; Mancini DM; Naka Y
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2015 Jan; 34(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 25444372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes in patients treated with heart transplantation with advanced age donors versus left ventricular assist device implantation.
    Ammirati E; Cipriani MG; Varrenti M; Colombo T; Garascia A; Cannata A; Pedrazzini G; Benazzi E; Milazzo F; Oliva F; Gagliardone MP; Russo CF; Frigerio M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Oct; 23(4):584-92. PubMed ID: 27245619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do Patients Supported With Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Have a Sufficient Risk of Death to Justify a Priority Allocation? A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Patients Listed in UNOS Status 2.
    Mastrobuoni S; Dell'Aquila AM; Van Caenegem O; Poncelet A; Jacquet LM; Garcia J
    Transplantation; 2018 Jun; 102(6):e288-e294. PubMed ID: 29346259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should patients 60 years and older undergo bridge to transplantation with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices?
    Allen JG; Kilic A; Weiss ES; Arnaoutakis GJ; George TJ; Shah AS; Conte JV
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Dec; 94(6):2017-24. PubMed ID: 22858277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postcardiac transplant survival in the current era in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.
    Kamdar F; John R; Eckman P; Colvin-Adams M; Shumway SJ; Liao K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Feb; 145(2):575-81. PubMed ID: 23321132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morbidity and mortality in heart transplant candidates supported with mechanical circulatory support: is reappraisal of the current United network for organ sharing thoracic organ allocation policy justified?
    Wever-Pinzon O; Drakos SG; Kfoury AG; Nativi JN; Gilbert EM; Everitt M; Alharethi R; Brunisholz K; Bader FM; Li DY; Selzman CH; Stehlik J
    Circulation; 2013 Jan; 127(4):452-62. PubMed ID: 23271796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk Stratification of Patients With Current Generation Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices Being Bridged to Heart Transplantation.
    Guha A; Nguyen D; Cruz-Solbes AS; Amione-Guerra J; Schutt RC; Bhimaraj A; Trachtenberg BH; Park MH; Graviss EA; Gaber O; Suarez E; Montane E; Torre-Amione G; Estep JD
    ASAIO J; 2018; 64(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 28885379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Left ventricular assist device-related infection: treatment and outcome.
    Simon D; Fischer S; Grossman A; Downer C; Hota B; Heroux A; Trenholme G
    Clin Infect Dis; 2005 Apr; 40(8):1108-15. PubMed ID: 15791509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of infection among left ventricular assist device recipients on post-transplantation outcomes: A retrospective review.
    Lerman DT; Hamilton KW; Byrne D; Lee DF; Zeitler K; Claridge T; Gray J; Minamoto GY
    Transpl Infect Dis; 2018 Dec; 20(6):e12995. PubMed ID: 30199584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infections during left ventricular assist device support do not affect posttransplant outcomes.
    Sinha P; Chen JM; Flannery M; Scully BE; Oz MC; Edwards NM
    Circulation; 2000 Nov; 102(19 Suppl 3):III194-9. PubMed ID: 11082386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of Heart Transplant After Left Ventricular Assist Device Specific and Related Infection.
    Tong MZ; Smedira NG; Soltesz EG; Starling RC; Koval CE; Porepa L; Moazami N
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Oct; 100(4):1292-7. PubMed ID: 26188972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.