232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30576004)
21. A Classification System for Urodynamic Evaluation of Lower Urinary Tract System Dysfunction.
Athanasopoulos A
Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Oct; 3(4-5):498-501. PubMed ID: 28753884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validation of use of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) for impairment rating: a transversal retrospective study of 120 patients.
Timmermans L; Falez F; Mélot C; Wespes E
Neurourol Urodyn; 2013 Sep; 32(7):974-9. PubMed ID: 23281067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Urodynamic assessment of bladder and urethral function among men with lower urinary tract symptoms after radical prostatectomy: A comparison between men with and without urinary incontinence.
Lee H; Kim KB; Lee S; Lee SW; Kim M; Cho SY; Oh SJ; Jeong SJ
Korean J Urol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):803-10. PubMed ID: 26682020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Urodynamics: examining the current role of UDS testing. What is the role of urodynamic testing in light of recent AUA urodynamics and overactive bladder guidelines and the VALUE study?
Brown ET; Krlin RM; Winters JC
Curr Urol Rep; 2013 Oct; 14(5):403-8. PubMed ID: 23904217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. When should we use urodynamic testing? Recommendations of the Italian Society of Urodynamics (SIUD). Part 1 - Female population.
Braga A; Finazzi Agrò E; Illiano E; Manassero F; Milanesi M; Natale F; Torella M; Pistolesi D; De Nunzio C; Soligo M; Serati M
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Feb; 72(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 31086135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. When should video be added to conventional urodynamics in adults and is it justified by the evidence? ICI-RS 2014.
Anding R; Rosier P; Smith P; Gammie A; Giarenis I; Rantell A; Thiruchelvam N; Arlandis S; Cardozo L
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Feb; 35(2):324-9. PubMed ID: 26872576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Is the Gaudenz Incontinence Questionnaire still relevant in diagnosis of urodynamic function?].
Häusler G; Joura E; Hanzal E; Kölbl H
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1994; 34(1):25-6. PubMed ID: 8019166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnosis of male incontinence.
Burden H; Warren K; Abrams P
Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Nov; 23(6):509-14. PubMed ID: 24080813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Diagnosis of overactive bladder influenced by methods of clinical assessment--micturition diary vs. urodynamics].
Skorupski P; Tomaszewski J; Adamiak A; Jankiewicz K; Rechberger T
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1018-22. PubMed ID: 14674162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Leak point pressures: how useful are they?
Burden H; Warren K; Abrams P
Curr Opin Urol; 2015 Jul; 25(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 26049875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Urological diagnosis in children with myelomeningocele].
Goepel M; Krege S; Portgys P; Rübben H
Urologe A; 1999 Jan; 38(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 10081094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characteristics of urinary incontinence in elderly patients studied by 24-hour monitoring and urodynamic testing.
Griffiths DJ; McCracken PN; Harrison GM; Gormley EA
Age Ageing; 1992 May; 21(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 1615782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The role of urodynamic assessment in the diagnosis of lower urinary tract disorders.
Clarke B
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 1997; 8(4):196-9. PubMed ID: 9449295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Urodynamic studies in children].
Moscovici J
Ann Urol (Paris); 1993; 27(6-7):321-5. PubMed ID: 8297161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Urodynamic study in the female urinary incontinence evaluation, with the new MoniTorr MR system (non-multichannel urodynamic with urethral retro-resistance pressure measure). Experience with 100 patients].
Dalenz SV; Arriola RP; Schanz PJ
Actas Urol Esp; 2008 Mar; 32(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 18512390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The correlation between clinical and urodynamic diagnosis in classifying the type of urinary incontinence in women. A systematic review of the literature.
van Leijsen SA; Hoogstad-van Evert JS; Mol BW; Vierhout ME; Milani AL; Heesakkers JP; Kluivers KB
Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Apr; 30(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 21298721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Urodynamic evaluation of the bladder and pelvic floor.
Bradley CS; Smith KE; Kreder KJ
Gastroenterol Clin North Am; 2008 Sep; 37(3):539-52, vii. PubMed ID: 18793995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Correlation between symptoms and urodynamic results in patients with urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.].
Medina-Polo J; Arrébola-Pajares A; de la Rosa-Kehrmann S; Romero-Otero J; García-Gómez B; Alonso-Isa M; Lara-Isla A; Duarte-Ojeda JM; Rodríguez-Antolín A; Passas-Martínez JB
Arch Esp Urol; 2018 Jul; 71(6):523-530. PubMed ID: 29991660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The utility of urodynamic testing.
Theofrastous JP; Whiteside J; Paraiso MF
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2003 Nov; 10(4):548-52. PubMed ID: 14738648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Need for urodynamic evaluation as a regular follow-up tool in assessment of long-term urological outcomes in patients with sacrococcygeal teratoma.
Khanna K; Agarwala S; Bakhshi S; Srinivas M; Jana M; Devasenathipathy K; Bajpai M; Bhatnagar V
J Pediatr Surg; 2019 Oct; 54(10):2107-2111. PubMed ID: 30686521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
