These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3057627)
1. Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life. Feinstein AR Science; 1988 Dec; 242(4883):1257-63. PubMed ID: 3057627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific standards of criticism: a reaction to "Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life," by A.R. Feinstein. Savitz DA; Greenland S; Stolley PD; Kelsey JL Epidemiology; 1990 Jan; 1(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 2081245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How trustworthy is epidemiologic research? Vandenbroucke JP Epidemiology; 1990 Jan; 1(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 2081247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific paradigms and ethical problems in epidemiologic research. Feinstein AR J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44 Suppl 1():119S-123S. PubMed ID: 2030382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Double standards, scientific methods, and epidemiologic research. Feinstein AR; Horwitz RI N Engl J Med; 1982 Dec; 307(26):1611-7. PubMed ID: 7144848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany]. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Scientific, practical and educational aspects of clinical epidemiology]. Briko NI Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 2012; (9):65-9. PubMed ID: 23210175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Moving towards a standards-based methodological quality assessment scheme for clinical research. Stone JC; Doi SAR Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2019 Jun; 17(2):72-73. PubMed ID: 31162275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors. Colombini D; Occhipinti E Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When can risk-factor epidemiology provide reliable tests? Mayo DG; Spanos A Epidemiology; 2004 Sep; 15(5):523-4; author reply 527-8. PubMed ID: 15308948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there epidemiology in Russia? Vlassov V J Epidemiol Community Health; 2000 Oct; 54(10):740-4. PubMed ID: 10990475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methodologic problems and standards in case-control research. Feinstein AR J Chronic Dis; 1979; 32(1-2):35-41. PubMed ID: 447778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific news and epidemiologic editorials: a reply to the critics. Feinstein AR Epidemiology; 1990 Mar; 1(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 2073508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods for quality-of-life studies. Testa MA; Nackley JF Annu Rev Public Health; 1994; 15():535-59. PubMed ID: 8054098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why are so many epidemiology associations inflated or wrong? Does poorly conducted animal research suggest implausible hypotheses? Bracken MB Ann Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 19(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 19217006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diet and cancer: the disconnect between epidemiology and randomized clinical trials. Meyskens FL; Szabo E Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Jun; 14(6):1366-9. PubMed ID: 15941942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]