These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3057715)

  • 1. Estimate of attenuation coefficient for ultrasonic tissue characterization using time-varying state-space model.
    Shih LY; Barnes CW; Ferrari LA
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Apr; 10(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 3057715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance evaluation of the spectral centroid downshift method for attenuation estimation.
    Samimi K; Varghese T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 May; 62(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 25965681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust estimation of ultrasound pulses using outlier-resistant de-noising.
    Michailovich O; Adam D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Mar; 22(3):368-81. PubMed ID: 12760554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signal to noise ratio comparisons for ultrasound attenuation slope estimation algorithms.
    Omari EA; Varghese T
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032902. PubMed ID: 24593741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of ultrasound attenuation and dispersion using short time Fourier transform.
    Zhao B; Basir OA; Mittal GS
    Ultrasonics; 2005 Mar; 43(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 15737388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monitoring imaging of lesions induced by high intensity focused ultrasound based on differential ultrasonic attenuation and integrated backscatter estimation.
    Zhong H; Wan MX; Jiang YF; Wang SP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 33(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 17189050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference Reference-phantom Method.
    Samimi K; Varghese T
    Ultrason Imaging; 2017 May; 39(3):151-171. PubMed ID: 28425388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1808-19. PubMed ID: 18621468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tissue Attenuation Estimation by Mean Frequency Downshift and Bandwidth Limitation.
    Klimonda Z; Postema M; Nowicki A; Litniewski J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Aug; 63(8):1107-15. PubMed ID: 27254862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attenuation and backscatter estimation using video signal analysis applied to B-mode images.
    Knipp BS; Zagzebski JA; Wilson TA; Dong F; Madsen EL
    Ultrason Imaging; 1997 Jul; 19(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 9447670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating ultrasonic parameters of biological tissue by adaptive filtering technique.
    Shiina T; Ikeda K; Saito M
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1988; 1(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 3153657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parameter estimation for nonlinear frequency dependent attenuation in soft tissue.
    He P; McGoron A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(8):757-63. PubMed ID: 2694562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the validity and improvement of the ultrasonic pulse-echo immersion technique to measure real attenuation.
    Goñi MA; Rousseau CE
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):544-50. PubMed ID: 23998204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unifying Concepts of Statistical and Spectral Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques.
    Destrempes F; Franceschini E; Yu FT; Cloutier G
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Feb; 35(2):488-500. PubMed ID: 26415165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On estimating the number density of random scatterers from backscattered acoustic signals.
    Sleefe GE; Lele PP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14(8):709-27. PubMed ID: 3062865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of ultrasound attenuation from broadband echo-signals using bandpass filtering.
    Kim H; Zagzebski JA; Varghese T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 May; 55(5):1153-9. PubMed ID: 18519224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Least-squares estimation of imaging parameters for an ultrasonic array using known geometric image features.
    Hunter AJ; Drinkwater BW; Wilcox PD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Feb; 58(2):414-26. PubMed ID: 21342827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of tissue parameters derived from reflected ultrasound.
    Shiina T; Ikeda K; Saito M
    Med Prog Technol; 1987; 12(3-4):185-95. PubMed ID: 3306305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided B-mode ultrasound diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: a feasibility study.
    Thijssen JM; Starke A; Weijers G; Haudum A; Herzog K; Wohlsein P; Rehage J; De Korte CL
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008; 55(6):1343-54. PubMed ID: 18599422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential attenuation imaging for the characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound lesions.
    Ribault M; Chapelon JY; Cathignol D; Gelet A
    Ultrason Imaging; 1998 Jul; 20(3):160-77. PubMed ID: 9921617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.