These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

648 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30577727)

  • 1. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
    Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthogonal Estimates of Variances for Additive, Dominance, and Epistatic Effects in Populations.
    Vitezica ZG; Legarra A; Toro MA; Varona L
    Genetics; 2017 Jul; 206(3):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 28522540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of non-additive genetic effects on carcass and meat quality traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle using genomic models.
    Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Lee DH; Chung Y; Lee DJ; Kang JM; Lee SH
    Animal; 2024 May; 18(5):101152. PubMed ID: 38701710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of nonadditive effects in yearling weight of tropical beef cattle.
    Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Vitezica ZG; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4028-4034. PubMed ID: 30032181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Ostersen T; Henryon M; Lund MS
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45293. PubMed ID: 23028912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of additive and non-additive genetic effects for fertility and reproduction traits in North American Holstein cattle using genomic information.
    Alves K; Brito LF; Baes CF; Sargolzaei M; Robinson JAB; Schenkel FS
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 May; 137(3):316-330. PubMed ID: 31912573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic selection models for directional dominance: an example for litter size in pigs.
    Varona L; Legarra A; Herring W; Vitezica ZG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jan; 50(1):1. PubMed ID: 29373954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
    Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SNP-based mate allocation strategies to maximize total genetic value in pigs.
    González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Carillier-Jacquin C; Bouquet A; Vitezica ZG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):55. PubMed ID: 31558151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-additive genetic variation in growth, carcass and fertility traits of beef cattle.
    Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Zhang Y; Reverter A; Barendse W; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):26. PubMed ID: 25880217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic dissection of maternal, additive and non-additive genetic effects for growth and carcass traits in Nile tilapia.
    Joshi R; Meuwissen THE; Woolliams JA; Gjøen HM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jan; 52(1):1. PubMed ID: 31941436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Significance of linkage disequilibrium and epistasis on genetic variances in noninbred and inbred populations.
    Viana JMS; Garcia AAF
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):286. PubMed ID: 35397494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
    Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic relationships reveal significant dominance effects for growth in hybrid Eucalyptus.
    Tan B; Grattapaglia D; Wu HX; Ingvarsson PK
    Plant Sci; 2018 Feb; 267():84-93. PubMed ID: 29362102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The contribution of dominance and inbreeding depression in estimating variance components for litter size in Pannon White rabbits.
    Nagy I; Gorjanc G; Curik I; Farkas J; Kiszlinger H; Szendrő Z
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Aug; 130(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 23855632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Additive and Dominance Genomic Analysis for Litter Size in Purebred and Crossbred Iberian Pigs.
    Srihi H; Noguera JL; Topayan V; Martín de Hijas M; Ibañez-Escriche N; Casellas J; Vázquez-Gómez M; Martínez-Castillero M; Rosas JP; Varona L
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 35052355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of dominance variance in purebred Yorkshire swine.
    Culbertson MS; Mabry JW; Misztal I; Gengler N; Bertrand JK; Varona L
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Feb; 76(2):448-51. PubMed ID: 9498351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic prediction using models with dominance and imprinting effects for backfat thickness and average daily gain in Danish Duroc pigs.
    Guo X; Christensen OF; Ostersen T; Wang Y; Lund MS; Su G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):67. PubMed ID: 27623617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genetics; 2018 Jul; 209(3):711-723. PubMed ID: 29743175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.