200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30579408)
1. Development and evaluation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery score (ObsQoR-11) after elective Caesarean delivery.
Ciechanowicz S; Setty T; Robson E; Sathasivam C; Chazapis M; Dick J; Carvalho B; Sultan P
Br J Anaesth; 2019 Jan; 122(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 30579408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-11) following non-elective caesarean delivery.
Ciechanowicz S; Howle R; Heppolette C; Nakhjavani B; Carvalho B; Sultan P
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2019 Aug; 39():51-59. PubMed ID: 30885691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of an obstetric quality of recovery scoring tool (ObsQoR-11) after elective caesarean delivery in a developing country: a prospective observational study.
Kumar S; Ashok V; Jain D; Arora A; Singh A; Sikka P
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2022 Feb; 49():103235. PubMed ID: 34810053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of Chinese version of a global anesthetic recovery questionnaire: A multicenter observational trial on ObsQoR-11.
Chou WH; Lee SO; Sun MH; Tseng YC; Chan KC; Chen YH; Wu CY
J Formos Med Assoc; 2023 Jun; 122(6):479-485. PubMed ID: 36593133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of Hindi version of the obstetric quality of recovery score-11 (ObsQoR-11 H) following elective caesarean section.
Gupta S; Choudhary S; Choudhary V; Jain K; Bhatia N; Gupta A
Indian J Anaesth; 2023 Nov; 67(Suppl 4):S251-S256. PubMed ID: 38187972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation and Clinical Utility of the Korean Version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11) Following Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.
Kang R; Lee S; Lee E; Cho YJ; Jeong JS; Choi SJ; Gwak MS; Sim WS; Kim DK; Ko JS
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35204382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and validation of a Portuguese version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10-Portuguese).
Mathias LAST; Carlos RV; Siaulys MM; Gabriades P; Guo N; Domingue B; O'Carroll J; Carvalho B; Sultan P
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2022 Jun; 41(3):101085. PubMed ID: 35487408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and validation of a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item score (ObsQoR-10-Spanish).
Guevara J; Sánchez C; Organista-Montaño J; Domingue BW; Guo N; Sultan P
BJA Open; 2024 Jun; 10():100269. PubMed ID: 38560622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Thai version of the obstetric quality of recovery score (obsqor-10-Thai) after elective cesarean delivery.
Dusitkasem S; Jindapitak J; Arnuntasupakul V; Lekprasert V; Bumrungphuet S; Sukying C; Komonhirun R; Sangkum L
BMC Anesthesiol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):72. PubMed ID: 36882676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of spontaneous versus operative vaginal delivery using Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10): An observational cohort study.
Sultan P; Kormendy F; Nishimura S; Carvalho B; Guo N; Papageorgiou C
J Clin Anesth; 2020 Aug; 63():109781. PubMed ID: 32203873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15.
Stark PA; Myles PS; Burke JA
Anesthesiology; 2013 Jun; 118(6):1332-40. PubMed ID: 23411725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Translation and validation of the French version of the ObsQoR-10 questionnaire for the evaluation of recovery after delivery: the ObsQoR-10-French.
Mazoué É; Veret M; Corroënne R; Mercier MB; Lomo H; Verhaeghe C; Lasocki S; Bouet PE; Léger M
BJA Open; 2023 Sep; 7():100221. PubMed ID: 37638079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of translated Obstetric Quality of Recovery (ObsQoR-10A) score after nonelective cesarean delivery (CD) in an Arabic-speaking population.
Mukarram S; Ali S; Zulqurnain M; Alkadi IAM; Alhatlan AI; Abbasi MZH; Mushtaq MQ; AbuHammad AY; Shahid K; Waqas A; Shafqat A
Saudi J Anaesth; 2022; 16(4):390-400. PubMed ID: 36337390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40.
Myles PS; Weitkamp B; Jones K; Melick J; Hensen S
Br J Anaesth; 2000 Jan; 84(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 10740540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-11) to measure the impact of an enhanced recovery programme for elective caesarean section.
Kielty J; Borkowska A; Lawlor E; El-Khuffash AF; Doherty A; O'Flaherty D
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2024 Feb; 57():103955. PubMed ID: 38030526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean delivery.
Ozkan G; Kara U; Ince ME; Ozdemir O; Ulubay M; Senkal S
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Nov; 20(1):155. PubMed ID: 36443784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population.
Demumieux F; Ludes PO; Diemunsch P; Bennett-Guerrero E; Lujic M; Lefebvre F; Noll E
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Jun; 124(6):761-767. PubMed ID: 32303379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The association between primary language and quality of recovery following caesarean section: a prospective observational study.
Brinkler R; Edwards M
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2020 Nov; 44():68-73. PubMed ID: 32810651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.
Kleif J; Edwards HM; Sort R; Vilandt J; Gögenur I
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2015 Aug; 59(7):912-20. PubMed ID: 25867135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults.
Myles PS; Hunt JO; Nightingale CE; Fletcher H; Beh T; Tanil D; Nagy A; Rubinstein A; Ponsford JL
Anesth Analg; 1999 Jan; 88(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 9895071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
