These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30579632)

  • 1. How can no change in an auditory stimulus generate an N2b-P3a?
    Cozzi J; Angel R; Herdman A
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Feb; 129():9-15. PubMed ID: 30579632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Event-related potentials following gaps in noise: The effects of the intensity of preceding noise.
    Duda V; Campbell K; Koravand A
    Brain Res; 2020 Dec; 1748():147078. PubMed ID: 32861677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional rather than sensory differences characterize auditory processing in Williams syndrome.
    Jacobs M; Dykens EM; Key AP
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Mar; 121():24-37. PubMed ID: 29353707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of stimulus intensity and auditory white noise on human somatosensory cognitive processing: a study using event-related potentials.
    Mizukami H; Kakigi R; Nakata H
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 237(2):521-530. PubMed ID: 30474688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human evoked cortical activity to silent gaps in noise: effects of age, attention, and cortical processing speed.
    Harris KC; Wilson S; Eckert MA; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 22374321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. P3a from auditory white noise stimuli.
    Combs LA; Polich J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 May; 117(5):1106-12. PubMed ID: 16564203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Background Suppression and its Relation to Foreground Processing of Speech Versus Non-speech Streams.
    Zhang X; Li X; Chen J; Gong Q
    Neuroscience; 2018 Mar; 373():60-71. PubMed ID: 29337239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory Mismatch Negativity and P300a Elicited by the "Optimal" Multi-feature Paradigm in Early Schizophrenia.
    Fisher DJ; Campbell DJ; Abriel SC; Ells EML; Rudolph ED; Tibbo PG
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 49(4):238-247. PubMed ID: 29502452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
    Borchard JP; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sleep deprivation moderates neural processes associated with passive auditory capture.
    Muller-Gass A; Campbell K
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Jun; 132():89-97. PubMed ID: 30939357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural Correlates of Selective Attention With Hearing Aid Use Followed by ReadMyQuips Auditory Training Program.
    Rao A; Rishiq D; Yu L; Zhang Y; Abrams H
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 27556531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mismatch negativity to inclusions of noise within complex spectrotemporal sound patterns.
    Marcoux A; Muller-Gass A; Logan J; Campbell KB
    Neuroreport; 1999 Jul; 10(10):2157-63. PubMed ID: 10424691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning to predict: Neuronal signatures of auditory expectancy in human event-related potentials.
    Fishman YI; Lee WW; Sussman E
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 225():117472. PubMed ID: 33099012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of task relevance and novelty for the P3a component.
    Hirata K; Hozumi A; Tanaka H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1999; 49():154-9. PubMed ID: 10533101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cholinergic Mechanisms of Target Oddball Stimuli Detection: The Late "P300-Like" Event-Related Potential in Rats.
    Ahnaou A; Biermans R; Drinkenburg WHIM
    Neural Plast; 2018; 2018():4270263. PubMed ID: 30410536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The P300 auditory event-related potential as a method to assess the benefit of contralateral hearing aid use in bimodal listeners: a proof-of-concept.
    Van Yper LN; Dhooge IJM; Vermeire K; De Vel EFJ; Beynon AJ
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 31460806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of novelty on event-related potentials: aging and stimulus replacement.
    Pató L; Czigler I
    Gerontology; 2011; 57(4):364-74. PubMed ID: 20424430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.