These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30579636)
1. Prediction uncertainty assessment of chromatography models using Bayesian inference. Briskot T; Stückler F; Wittkopp F; Williams C; Yang J; Konrad S; Doninger K; Griesbach J; Bennecke M; Hepbildikler S; Hubbuch J J Chromatogr A; 2019 Feb; 1587():101-110. PubMed ID: 30579636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data. Van Oijen M; Rougier J; Smith R Tree Physiol; 2005 Jul; 25(7):915-27. PubMed ID: 15870058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants. Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantifying the uncertainty in model parameters using Gaussian process-based Markov chain Monte Carlo in cardiac electrophysiology. Dhamala J; Arevalo HJ; Sapp J; Horácek BM; Wu KC; Trayanova NA; Wang L Med Image Anal; 2018 Aug; 48():43-57. PubMed ID: 29843078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian evaluation of a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of long-term kinetics of metal nanoparticles in rats. Sweeney LM; MacCalman L; Haber LT; Kuempel ED; Tran CL Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Oct; 73(1):151-63. PubMed ID: 26145831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying Registration Uncertainty With Sparse Bayesian Modelling. Le Folgoc L; Delingette H; Criminisi A; Ayache N IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 36(2):607-617. PubMed ID: 27831863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Harnessing the theoretical foundations of the exponential and beta-Poisson dose-response models to quantify parameter uncertainty using Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Schmidt PJ; Pintar KD; Fazil AM; Topp E Risk Anal; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1677-93. PubMed ID: 23311599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian Monte Carlo and maximum likelihood approach for uncertainty estimation and risk management: Application to lake oxygen recovery model. Chaudhary A; Hantush MM Water Res; 2017 Jan; 108():301-311. PubMed ID: 27836170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advanced error modeling and Bayesian uncertainty quantification in mechanistic liquid chromatography modeling. Heymann W; Glaser J; Schlegel F; Johnson W; Rolandi P; von Lieres E J Chromatogr A; 2023 Oct; 1708():464329. PubMed ID: 37714013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation in molecular dynamics simulations: a high performance computing framework. Angelikopoulos P; Papadimitriou C; Koumoutsakos P J Chem Phys; 2012 Oct; 137(14):144103. PubMed ID: 23061835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for computing multivariate maximum likelihood estimates and posterior distributions: mixture dose-response assessment. Li R; Englehardt JD; Li X Risk Anal; 2012 Feb; 32(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 21906114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical issues in toxicokinetic modeling: a bayesian perspective. Bernillon P; Bois FY Environ Health Perspect; 2000 Oct; 108 Suppl 5():883-93. PubMed ID: 11035998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian population analysis of a washin-washout physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for acetone. Mörk AK; Jonsson F; Johanson G Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Nov; 240(3):423-32. PubMed ID: 19660484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-dimensional Bayesian parameter estimation: case study for a model of JAK2/STAT5 signaling. Hug S; Raue A; Hasenauer J; Bachmann J; Klingmüller U; Timmer J; Theis FJ Math Biosci; 2013 Dec; 246(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 23602931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian-based calibration for water quality model parameters. Bai B; Dong F; Peng W; Liu X Water Environ Res; 2023 Oct; 95(10):e10936. PubMed ID: 37807852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling. Dotto CB; Mannina G; Kleidorfer M; Vezzaro L; Henrichs M; McCarthy DT; Freni G; Rauch W; Deletic A Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2545-58. PubMed ID: 22402270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parameter optimization and uncertainty assessment for rainfall frequency modeling using an adaptive Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Liu X; Xia C; Tang Y; Tu J; Wang H Water Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 83(5):1085-1102. PubMed ID: 33724938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revised assessment of cancer risk to dichloromethane: part I Bayesian PBPK and dose-response modeling in mice. Marino DJ; Clewell HJ; Gentry PR; Covington TR; Hack CE; David RM; Morgott DA Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Jun; 45(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 16442684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A stochastic regression approach to analyzing thermodynamic uncertainty in chemical speciation modeling. Weber CL; Vanbriesen JM; Small MS Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jun; 40(12):3872-8. PubMed ID: 16830555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]