211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30579955)
1. Many alternative and theoretical genetic codes are more robust to amino acid replacements than the standard genetic code.
Błażej P; Wnętrzak M; Mackiewicz D; Gagat P; Mackiewicz P
J Theor Biol; 2019 Mar; 464():21-32. PubMed ID: 30579955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm.
Wnętrzak M; Błażej P; Mackiewicz D; Mackiewicz P
BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):192. PubMed ID: 30545289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of the standard genetic code in terms of two mutation types: Point mutations and frameshifts.
Wnętrzak M; Błażej P; Mackiewicz P
Biosystems; 2019 Jul; 181():44-50. PubMed ID: 31042561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of the standard genetic code according to three codon positions using an evolutionary algorithm.
Błażej P; Wnętrzak M; Mackiewicz D; Mackiewicz P
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201715. PubMed ID: 30092017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimality in the standard genetic code is robust with respect to comparison code sets.
Wichmann S; Ardern Z
Biosystems; 2019 Nov; 185():104023. PubMed ID: 31520875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The neutral emergence of error minimized genetic codes superior to the standard genetic code.
Massey SE
J Theor Biol; 2016 Nov; 408():237-242. PubMed ID: 27544417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evolution of the genetic code: partial optimization of a random code for robustness to translation error in a rugged fitness landscape.
Novozhilov AS; Wolf YI; Koonin EV
Biol Direct; 2007 Oct; 2():24. PubMed ID: 17956616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simulated evolution applied to study the genetic code optimality using a model of codon reassignments.
Santos J; Monteagudo A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 12():56. PubMed ID: 21338505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimality of circular codes versus the genetic code after frameshift errors.
Dila G; Michel CJ; Thompson JD
Biosystems; 2020 Jul; 195():104134. PubMed ID: 32251681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Codon usage bias and mutation constraints reduce the level of error minimization of the genetic code.
Archetti M
J Mol Evol; 2004 Aug; 59(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 15486699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model of Genetic Code Structure Evolution under Various Types of Codon Reading.
Błażej P; Pawlak K; Mackiewicz D; Mackiewicz P
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Feb; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35163612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fitting the standard genetic code into its triplet table.
Yarus M
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Sep; 118(36):. PubMed ID: 34462348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of different types of translational inaccuracies on the genetic code structure.
BłaŻej P; Wnetrzak M; Mackiewicz D; Mackiewicz P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Mar; 20(1):114. PubMed ID: 30841864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the Genetic Code Optimized for Resource Conservation?
Xu H; Zhang J
Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Oct; 38(11):5122-5126. PubMed ID: 34383940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A computational screen for alternative genetic codes in over 250,000 genomes.
Shulgina Y; Eddy SR
Elife; 2021 Nov; 10():. PubMed ID: 34751130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A crescendo of competent coding (c3) contains the Standard Genetic Code.
Yarus M
RNA; 2022 Oct; 28(10):1337-1347. PubMed ID: 35868841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of translation loads for standard and alternative genetic codes.
Sammet SG; Bastolla U; Porto M
BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Jun; 10():178. PubMed ID: 20546599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of crossover operator in evolutionary-based approach to the problem of genetic code optimization.
Błażej P; Wnȩtrzak M; Mackiewicz P
Biosystems; 2016 Dec; 150():61-72. PubMed ID: 27555085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Origin and evolution of the genetic code: the universal enigma.
Koonin EV; Novozhilov AS
IUBMB Life; 2009 Feb; 61(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 19117371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Searching of code space for an error-minimized genetic code via codon capture leads to failure, or requires at least 20 improving codon reassignments via the ambiguous intermediate mechanism.
Massey SE
J Mol Evol; 2010 Jan; 70(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 20107777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
