These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30580224)

  • 1. Non-invasive embryo evaluation and selection using time-lapse monitoring: Results of a randomized controlled study.
    Kovacs P; Matyas S; Forgacs V; Sajgo A; Molnar L; Pribenszky C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Feb; 233():58-63. PubMed ID: 30580224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single embryo transfer by Day 3 time-lapse selection versus Day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
    Yang L; Cai S; Zhang S; Kong X; Gu Y; Lu C; Dai J; Gong F; Lu G; Lin G
    Hum Reprod; 2018 May; 33(5):869-876. PubMed ID: 29546361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved implantation rates of day 3 embryo transfers with the use of an automated time-lapse-enabled test to aid in embryo selection.
    Adamson GD; Abusief ME; Palao L; Witmer J; Palao LM; Gvakharia M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):369-75.e6. PubMed ID: 26604069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can novel early non-invasive biomarkers of embryo quality be identified with time-lapse imaging to predict live birth?
    Barberet J; Bruno C; Valot E; Antunes-Nunes C; Jonval L; Chammas J; Choux C; Ginod P; Sagot P; Soudry-Faure A; Fauque P
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 31287145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.
    Minasi MG; Colasante A; Riccio T; Ruberti A; Casciani V; Scarselli F; Spinella F; Fiorentino F; Varricchio MT; Greco E
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2245-54. PubMed ID: 27591227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized study of G-TL and global media for blastocyst culture in the EmbryoScope: morphokinetics, pregnancy, and live births after single-embryo transfer.
    Desai N; Yao M; Richards EG; Goldberg JM
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Dec; 114(6):1207-1215. PubMed ID: 32861442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study.
    Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A; Colamaria S; Ferrero S; Maggiulli R; Vajta G; Sapienza F; Cimadomo D; Giuliani M; Gravotta E; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2097-106. PubMed ID: 26150408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the addition of time-lapse morphokinetics in the selection of embryos for transfer improve pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial.
    Goodman LR; Goldberg J; Falcone T; Austin C; Desai N
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):275-85.e10. PubMed ID: 26522611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system.
    Motato Y; de los Santos MJ; Escriba MJ; Ruiz BA; Remohí J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):376-84.e9. PubMed ID: 26598211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Embryo selection using time-lapse analysis (Early Embryo Viability Assessment) in conjunction with standard morphology: a prospective two-center pilot study.
    Kieslinger DC; De Gheselle S; Lambalk CB; De Sutter P; Kostelijk EH; Twisk JW; van Rijswijk J; Van den Abbeel E; Vergouw CG
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2450-2457. PubMed ID: 27619774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time of morulation and trophectoderm quality are predictors of a live birth after euploid blastocyst transfer: a multicenter study.
    Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Delgado A; Minasi MG; Fabozzi G; Gallego RD; Stoppa M; Bellver J; Giancani A; Esbert M; Capalbo A; Remohì J; Greco E; Ubaldi FM; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2019 Dec; 112(6):1080-1093.e1. PubMed ID: 31843084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial comparing embryo development using media developed for sequential or undisturbed culture in a time-lapse setup.
    Hardarson T; Bungum M; Conaghan J; Meintjes M; Chantilis SJ; Molnar L; Gunnarsson K; Wikland M
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1452-9.e1-4. PubMed ID: 26409153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A double-blind randomized controlled trial investigating a time-lapse algorithm for selecting Day 5 blastocysts for transfer.
    Ahlström A; Lundin K; Lind AK; Gunnarsson K; Westlander G; Park H; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Thorsteinsdottir SA; Einarsson S; Åström M; Löfdahl K; Menezes J; Callender S; Nyberg C; Winerdal J; Stenfelt C; Jonassen BR; Oldereid N; Nolte L; Sundler M; Hardarson T
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Apr; 37(4):708-717. PubMed ID: 35143661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experience of using time lapse microscopy in the IVF program in patients with good ovarian reserve.
    Saraeva NV; Spiridonova NV; Tugushev MT; Shurygina OV; Arabadzhyan SI; Victorovna IO
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2019; 35(sup1):15-17. PubMed ID: 31532311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
    Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution of embryo selection for IVF from subjective morphology assessment to objective time-lapse algorithms improves chance of live birth.
    Fishel S; Campbell A; Foad F; Davies L; Best L; Davis N; Smith R; Duffy S; Wheat S; Montgomery S; Wachter A; Beccles A
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Jan; 40(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 31831370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time-lapse imaging algorithms rank human preimplantation embryos according to the probability of live birth.
    Fishel S; Campbell A; Montgomery S; Smith R; Nice L; Duffy S; Jenner L; Berrisford K; Kellam L; Smith R; Foad F; Beccles A
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2018 Sep; 37(3):304-313. PubMed ID: 30314885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the efficacy of six published time-lapse imaging embryo selection algorithms to predict implantation to demonstrate the need for the development of specific, in-house morphokinetic selection algorithms.
    Barrie A; Homburg R; McDowell G; Brown J; Kingsland C; Troup S
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):613-621. PubMed ID: 28069186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
    Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Elliott T; Wright G; Nagy ZP; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review.
    Kaser DJ; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod Update; 2014; 20(5):617-31. PubMed ID: 24890606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.