204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30580858)
1. Performance and clinical comparison between left ventricular quadripolar and bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Observational research.
Ziacchi M; Zucchelli G; Ricciardi D; Morani G; De Ruvo E; Calzolari V; Viani S; Calabrese V; Tomasi L; Calò L; De Mattia L; Bongiorni MG; Boriani G; Biffi M
Indian Heart J; 2018; 70(6):864-871. PubMed ID: 30580858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of a novel left ventricular lead with short bipolar spacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: primary results of the Attain Performa quadripolar left ventricular lead study.
Crossley GH; Biffi M; Johnson B; Lin A; Gras D; Hussin A; Cuffio A; Collier JL; El-Chami M; Li S; Holloman K; Exner DV
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Apr; 12(4):751-8. PubMed ID: 25533587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Multicenter Registry.
Behar JM; Bostock J; Zhu Li AP; Chin HM; Jubb S; Lent E; Gamble J; Foley PW; Betts TR; Rinaldi CA; Herring N
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 May; 26(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 25631303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients with Quadripolar LV Leads: The EffaceQ Study.
Oswald H; Asbach S; Köbe J; Weglage H; Schulte-Pitzke B; Brachmann J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 38(8):942-50. PubMed ID: 25974406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.
Leyva F; Zegard A; Qiu T; Acquaye E; Ferrante G; Walton J; Marshall H
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 29042422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study.
Forleo GB; Di Biase L; Panattoni G; Mantica M; Parisi Q; Martino A; Pappalardo A; Sergi D; Tesauro M; Papavasileiou LP; Santini L; Calò L; Tondo C; Natale A; Romeo F
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 25504267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes.
Forleo GB; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Molfetta AD; Santini L; Romeo F
Heart Rhythm; 2011 Jan; 8(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 20887804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of quadripolar LV leads on heart failure hospitalization rates among patients implanted with CRT-D: data from the Israeli ICD Registry.
Leshem E; Suleiman M; Laish-Farkash A; Haim M; Geist M; Luria D; Glikson M; Goldenberg I; Michowitz Y;
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 29274032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-invasive hemodynamic analysis in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients wearing quadripolar left ventricular leads: the importance of pacing electrode selection.
Santini L; Legramante J; Condemi F; Santucci L; Panattoni M; Crobeddu P; Sergi D; Forleo G; Romeo F
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2014 Dec; 62(6):449-59. PubMed ID: 25275712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bipolar active fixation left ventricular lead or quadripolar passive fixation lead? An Italian multicenter experience.
Ziacchi M; Giannola G; Lunati M; Infusino T; Luzzi G; Rordorf R; Pecora D; Bongiorni MG; De Ruvo E; Biffi M
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2019 Apr; 20(4):192-200. PubMed ID: 30762662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acute and mid-term outcomes of transvenous implant of a new left ventricular quadripolar lead versus bipolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from a single-center prospective database.
Arias MA; Pachón M; Puchol A; Jiménez-López J; Rodríguez-Padial L
Cardiol J; 2012; 19(5):470-8. PubMed ID: 23042310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Application and efficacy of the adjustment on left ventricular electrical delay and the distance between right and left ventricular pacing polar in optimizing the left ventricular pacing polar].
Yan XL; Liang YC; Yu HB; Xu BG; Gao Y; Liu R; Xu GQ; Wu M
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 48(8):669-674. PubMed ID: 32847323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling Elicited by a Quadripolar Lead: Results from the Multicenter Per4mer Study.
Ziacchi M; Saporito D; Zardini M; Luzi M; Quartieri F; Morgagni G; De Maria E; Bertini M; Carinci V; Boriani G; Biffi M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 39(3):250-60. PubMed ID: 26643691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of quadripolar left ventricular leads improves the hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Osca J; Alonso P; Cano Ó; Sánchez JM; Tejada D; Andrés A; Sancho Tello MJ; Olagüe J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Mar; 38(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 25492127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study.
Forleo GB; Mantica M; Di Biase L; Panattoni G; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Santamaria M; Santangeli P; Avella A; Sergi D; Santini L; Tondo C; Natale A; Romeo F
Heart Rhythm; 2012 Nov; 9(11):1822-8. PubMed ID: 22841876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maximization of interventricular conduction time by means of quadripolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Stabile G; Bianchi V; Solimene F; Iuliano A; Parisi Q; Pepi P; Bocchiardo M; Urraro F; De Simone A; Ospizio R; D'Onofrio A
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Oct; 50(1):111-115. PubMed ID: 28798987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term follow-up of patients with a quadripolar active fixation left ventricular lead: An Italian multicenter experience.
De Regibus V; Biffi M; Infusino T; Savastano S; Landolina M; Palmisano P; Foti R; Facchin D; Dello Russo A; Urraro F; Ziacchi M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1567-1575. PubMed ID: 35634866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvement in hemodynamic response using a quadripolar LV lead.
Cabrera Bueno F; Alzueta Rodríguez J; Olagüe de Ros J; Fernández-Lozano I; García Guerrero JJ; de la Concha JF; Hernández Madrid A; Tolosana Viu JM; Osca Asensi J; Barrera Cordero A; Llorente Hernangómez E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2013 Aug; 36(8):963-9. PubMed ID: 23692289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implant Characteristics of Quadripolar and Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
Ando K; Kanda S; Miura F; Ashikaga K; Ehara N; Sakai Y; Furukawa T; Yoshimura H; Adachi K
Int Heart J; 2018 Sep; 59(5):1002-1007. PubMed ID: 30158380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical efficacy of left ventricular pacing vector programmability in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator patients for management of phrenic nerve stimulation and/or elevated left ventricular pacing thresholds: insights from the Efface Phrenic Stim study.
Klein N; Klein M; Weglage H; Przibille O; Fischer S; Trappe HJ; Birkenhauer F; Pfeiffer D;
Europace; 2012 Jun; 14(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 22277645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
