394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30580986)
1. Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of short dental implants in a resorbed mandible.
Lee H; Park S; Noh G
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):659-670. PubMed ID: 30580986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of different abutment diameter of implants on the peri-implant stress in the crestal bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis--In vitro study.
Aradya A; Kumar UK; Chowdhary R
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 27054866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of different design of abutment and implant on stress distribution in 2 implants and peripheral bone: A finite element analysis study.
Kul E; Korkmaz İH
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):664.e1-664.e9. PubMed ID: 33573834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical effects of dental implant diameter, connection type, and bone density on microgap formation and fatigue failure: A finite element analysis.
Lee H; Jo M; Noh G
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Mar; 200():105863. PubMed ID: 33308905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.
Pessoa RS; Bezerra FJ; Sousa RM; Vander Sloten J; Casati MZ; Jaecques SV
J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):1161-71. PubMed ID: 24635544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stress distribution with extra-short implants in an angled frictional system: A finite element analysis study.
de Souza Rendohl E; Brandt WC
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):728.e1-728.e9. PubMed ID: 32694020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models.
Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis on Stress Distribution of Internal Implant-Abutment Engagement Features.
Cho SY; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):319-327. PubMed ID: 29534119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of implant diameter, implant-abutment connection type, and bone density on the biomechanical stability of implant components and bone: A finite element analysis study.
Lee H; Jo M; Sailer I; Noh G
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):716-728. PubMed ID: 33685654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical Behavior of Tooth-Implant Supported Prostheses With Different Implant Connections: A Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis.
de Paula GA; Silva GC; Vilaça ÊL; Cornacchia TM; de Magalhães CS; Moreira AN
Implant Dent; 2018 Jun; 27(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 29521677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
