These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30580986)

  • 41. Biomechanical evaluation of stress distributions at the implant-abutment complex and peri-implant bone around mandibular dental implants with different neck geometries and inclinations.
    Dinc MM; Turkoglu P; Selvi F
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Sep; 235(9):1035-1045. PubMed ID: 34098780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
    Asvanund P; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of shoulder coverage difference of abutment on stress distribution and screw stability in tissue-level internal connection implants: A finite element analysis and in vitro study.
    Lee HY; Yang SW; Kang YJ; Oh KC; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):682.e1-682.e10. PubMed ID: 33551133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws.
    Alkan I; Sertgöz A; Ekici B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15116032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; de Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Pellizzer EP
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34091686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioğlu H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 12869007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
    Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DAF; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CAA; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28222876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
    Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The biomechanical effect of platform switching on external- and internal-connection implants.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 23377059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants.
    de Matos JDM; Lopes GDRS; Nakano LJN; Ramos NC; Vasconcelos JEL; Bottino MA; Tribst JPM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Feb; 25(3):239-246. PubMed ID: 34559574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Influence of Different Abutment Designs on the Biomechanical Behavior of Dental Root-Analog Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    He L; Li D; Zhang J; Li X; Lu S; Tang Z
    Implant Dent; 2016 Dec; 25(6):802-806. PubMed ID: 27755176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of different implant-abutment joint design on abutment and abutment screw stress].
    Gao Y; Chen J; Wang GQ; Li YK; Bian CR
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2021 Oct; 30(5):481-487. PubMed ID: 34888599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of diameter, length and elastic modulus of a dental implant on stress and strain levels in peri-implant bone: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Robau-Porrua A; Pérez-Rodríguez Y; Soris-Rodríguez LM; Pérez-Acosta O; González JE
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2020; 30(5-6):541-558. PubMed ID: 31903978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. In vitro fatigue tests and in silico finite element analysis of dental implants with different fixture/abutment joint types using computer-aided design models.
    Yamaguchi S; Yamanishi Y; Machado LS; Matsumoto S; Tovar N; Coelho PG; Thompson VP; Imazato S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 28427837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Freitas-Júnior AC; Rocha EP; Bonfante EA; Almeida EO; Anchieta RB; Martini AP; Assunção WG; Silva NR; Coelho PG
    Dent Mater; 2012 Oct; 28(10):e218-28. PubMed ID: 22682782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Prosthetic abutment influences bone biomechanical behavior of immediately loaded implants.
    Camargos Gde V; Sotto-Maior BS; Silva WJ; Lazari PC; Del Bel Cury AA
    Braz Oral Res; 2016 May; 30(1):. PubMed ID: 27253141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.