These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30582471)
41. The Biomechanical E-Staging: In Vivo Biomechanics in Keratoconus. Flockerzi E; Xanthopoulou K; Munteanu C; Daas L; Langenbucher A; Seitz B Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2023 Jun; 240(6):761-773. PubMed ID: 37348512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus. Chan TC; Wang YM; Yu M; Jhanji V Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 28559422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Evaluation of corneal deformation analyzed with Scheimpflug based device in healthy eyes and diseased ones. Lanza M; Cennamo M; Iaccarino S; Irregolare C; Rechichi M; Bifani M; Gironi Carnevale UA Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():748671. PubMed ID: 25054144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Analysis of Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Different Keratotopographic Patterns of Keratoconus. Solodkova EG; Malyugin BE; Zakharov IN; Le VH; Balalin SV; Lobanov EV; Balalin AS J Curr Ophthalmol; 2023; 35(3):249-258. PubMed ID: 38681694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Dynamic curvature topography for evaluating the anterior corneal surface change with Corvis ST. Ji C; Yu J; Li T; Tian L; Huang Y; Wang Y; Zheng Y Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Jun; 14():53. PubMed ID: 26040948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Intraocular pressure measurements and corneal biomechanical properties using a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer, after several keratoplasty techniques, versus normal eyes. Hugo J; Granget E; Ho Wang Yin G; Sampo M; Hoffart L J Fr Ophtalmol; 2018 Jan; 41(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 29191679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection. Ambrósio R; Lopes BT; Faria-Correia F; Salomão MQ; Bühren J; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P J Refract Surg; 2017 Jul; 33(7):434-443. PubMed ID: 28681902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. In-vivo high-speed biomechanical imaging of the cornea using Corvis ST and digital image correlation. Wang B; Yang L; Cheng J; Wang J; Mei Y Comput Biol Med; 2023 Feb; 153():106540. PubMed ID: 36646022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. In Vivo Early Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Corneal Cross-linking in Patients With Progressive Keratoconus. Vinciguerra R; Romano V; Arbabi EM; Brunner M; Willoughby CE; Batterbury M; Kaye SB J Refract Surg; 2017 Dec; 33(12):840-846. PubMed ID: 29227513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Biomechanical Characterization of Subclinical Keratoconus Without Topographic or Tomographic Abnormalities. Vinciguerra R; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Azzolini C; Vinciguerra P J Refract Surg; 2017 Jun; 33(6):399-407. PubMed ID: 28586501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effects of age on corneal deformation by non-contact tonometry integrated with an ultra-high-speed (UHS) Scheimpflug camera. Valbon BF; Ambrósio R; Fontes BM; Alves MR Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2013; 76(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 24061834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Determining in vivo elasticity and viscosity with dynamic Scheimpflug imaging analysis in keratoconic and healthy eyes. Wang LK; Tian L; Zheng YP J Biophotonics; 2016 May; 9(5):454-63. PubMed ID: 26755237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Biomechanical and refractive behaviors of keratoconic cornea based on three-dimensional anisotropic hyperelastic models. Han Z; Sui X; Zhou D; Zhou C; Ren Q J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 23557227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The Effect of Intracorneal Ring Segments Implantation for Keratoconus on In Vivo Corneal Biomechanics Assessed With the Corvis ST. Vinciguerra R; Fernández-Vega-Cueto L; Poo-Lopez A; Eliasy A; Merayo-Lloves J; Elsheikh A; Madrid-Costa D; Lisa C; Alfonso JF J Refract Surg; 2022 Apr; 38(4):264-269. PubMed ID: 35412924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Keratoconus prognosis study for patients with corneal external mechanical stress mode. Bettahar T; Rahmoune C; Benazzouz D Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 40(7):1673-1686. PubMed ID: 32219616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer (Corvis ST) for measurement of corneal biomechanical parameters : A praxis-related overview]. Herber R; Terai N; Pillunat KR; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Spörl E Ophthalmologe; 2018 Aug; 115(8):635-643. PubMed ID: 29767348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Screening for Keratoconus With New Dynamic Biomechanical In Vivo Scheimpflug Analyses. Steinberg J; Katz T; Lücke K; Frings A; Druchkiv V; Linke SJ Cornea; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1404-12. PubMed ID: 26356751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of three intraocular pressure measurement methods including biomechanical properties of the cornea. Smedowski A; Weglarz B; Tarnawska D; Kaarniranta K; Wylegala E Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Feb; 55(2):666-73. PubMed ID: 24425850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Keratoconus prediction using a finite element model of the cornea with local biomechanical properties. Carvalho LA; Prado M; Cunha RH; Costa Neto A; Paranhos A; Schor P; Chamon W Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 19466318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Quantitative assessment of corneal vibrations during intraocular pressure measurement with the air-puff method in patients with keratoconus. Koprowski R; Ambrósio R Comput Biol Med; 2015 Nov; 66():170-8. PubMed ID: 26410602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]