These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30583889)
1. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French and the Voice Handicap Index. Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e1-646.e10. PubMed ID: 30583889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French. Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening. Faham M; Laukkanen AM; Ikävalko T; Rantala L; Geneid A; Holmqvist-Jämsén S; Ruusuvirta K; Pirilä S J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31582330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring The Validity of Acoustic Measurements and Other Voice Assessments. Englert M; Latoszek BBV; Behlau M J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):567-571. PubMed ID: 35022153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language. Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of VHI-30 to Acoustic Measurements Across Three Common Voice Disorders. Dehqan A; Yadegari F; Scherer RC; Dabirmoghadam P J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 27085912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech. Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population. Kim GH; von Latoszek BB; Lee YW J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e9-660.e18. PubMed ID: 31708369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Indices of Dysphonia Severity: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia. Lee JM; Roy N; Peterson E; Merrill RM J Voice; 2018 Jul; 32(4):515.e1-515.e13. PubMed ID: 28739333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in German. Barsties V Latoszek B; Lehnert B; Janotte B J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):157.e17-157.e25. PubMed ID: 30217485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population. Kankare E; Barsties V Latoszek B; Maryn Y; Asikainen M; Rorarius E; Vilpas S; Ilomäki I; Tyrmi J; Rantala L; Laukkanen AM Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Jul; 45(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 30720373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices. Uloza V; Latoszek BBV; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Maryn Y Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Responsiveness of Persian Version of Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), Persian Version of Voice Handicap Index (VHI), and Praat in Vocal Mass Lesions with Muscle Tension Dysphonia. Khoramshahi H; Khatoonabadi AR; Khoddami SM; Dabirmoghaddam P; Ansari NN J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):770.e21-770.e30. PubMed ID: 29029830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language. Englert M; Barsties V Latoszek B; Maryn Y; Behlau M J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):160.e15-160.e21. PubMed ID: 31474432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. External Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 With Extended Representativity. Barsties B; Maryn Y Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Jul; 125(7):571-83. PubMed ID: 26951063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Two Versions of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index for Quantification of Dysphonia Severity. Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Lee BJ; Kwon SB J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):489.e11-489.e19. PubMed ID: 30527706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of the acoustic voice quality index for objective measurement of dysphonia severity. Núñez-Batalla F; Díaz-Fresno E; Álvarez-Fernández A; Muñoz Cordero G; Llorente Pendás JL Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2017; 68(4):204-211. PubMed ID: 28213999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language. Kishore Pebbili G; Shabnam S; Pushpavathi M; Rashmi J; Gopi Sankar R; Nethra R; Shreya S; Shashish G J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):159.e11-159.e18. PubMed ID: 31543357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Voice Self-assessment Protocols: Different Trends Among Organic and Behavioral Dysphonias. Behlau M; Zambon F; Moreti F; Oliveira G; de Barros Couto E J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):112.e13-112.e27. PubMed ID: 27210475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language. Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB J Voice; 2019 Nov; 33(6):948.e1-948.e9. PubMed ID: 30076095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]