297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30585958)
1. Doses, Benefits, Safety, and Risks in Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnostic Imaging.
Lurie AG
Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 30585958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography.
Tyndall DA; Price JB; Tetradis S; Ganz SD; Hildebolt C; Scarfe WC;
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jun; 113(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 22668710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The ALARA-principle. Backgrounds and enforcement in dental practices].
Berkhout WE
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2015 May; 122(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 26210218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding and communicating radiation dose and risk from cone beam computed tomography in dentistry.
Aanenson JW; Till JE; Grogan HA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):353-360. PubMed ID: 29724555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.
Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.
Wrzesień M; Olszewski J
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lowering the Radiation Dose in Dental Offices.
Radan E
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2017 Apr; 45(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 29068621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient shielding during dentomaxillofacial radiography: Recommendations from the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.
Benavides E; Bhula A; Gohel A; Lurie AG; Mallya SM; Ramesh A; Tyndall DA
J Am Dent Assoc; 2023 Sep; 154(9):826-835.e2. PubMed ID: 37530694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Applications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Overview of Published Indications and Clinical Usage in United States Academic Centers and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Practices.
Carter JB; Stone JD; Clark RS; Mercer JE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):668-79. PubMed ID: 26611374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods for monitoring patient dose in dental radiology.
Helmrot E; Thilander-Klang A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):303-5. PubMed ID: 20223852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature.
De Vos W; Casselman J; Swennen GR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 38(6):609-25. PubMed ID: 19464146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EFFECTIVE DOSES AND RADIATION RISKS FROM COMMON DENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC, PANORAMIC AND CBCT EXAMINATIONS.
Shatskiy I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Oct; 195(3-4):296-305. PubMed ID: 34086952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone beam computed tomography: third eye in diagnosis and treatment planning.
Seth V; Kamath P; Vaidya N
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(2):17-22. PubMed ID: 22873019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oral and Maxillofacial Imaging.
Mupparapu M; Nadeau C
Dent Clin North Am; 2016 Jan; 60(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 26614948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation.
Scarfe WC; Li Z; Aboelmaaty W; Scott SA; Farman AG
Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():46-60. PubMed ID: 22376097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel low-dose protocols using cone beam computed tomography in dental medicine: a review focusing on indications, limitations, and future possibilities.
Yeung AWK; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jun; 23(6):2573-2581. PubMed ID: 31025192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
