251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30585971)
1. Recent Epidemiologic Studies and the Linear No-Threshold Model For Radiation Protection-Considerations Regarding NCRP Commentary 27.
Shore RE; Beck HL; Boice JD; Caffrey EA; Davis S; Grogan HA; Mettler FA; Preston RJ; Till JE; Wakeford R; Walsh L; Dauer LT
Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):235-246. PubMed ID: 30585971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear nonthreshold model and radiation protection.
Shore RE; Beck HL; Boice JD; Caffrey EA; Davis S; Grogan HA; Mettler FA; Preston RJ; Till JE; Wakeford R; Walsh L; Dauer LT
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Sep; 38(3):1217-1233. PubMed ID: 30004025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The linear nonthreshold (LNT) model as used in radiation protection: an NCRP update.
Boice JD
Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Oct; 93(10):1079-1092. PubMed ID: 28532210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A review of dosimetry used in epidemiological studies considered to evaluate the linear no-threshold (LNT) dose-response model for radiation protection.
Till JE; Beck HL; Grogan HA; Caffrey EA
Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Oct; 93(10):1128-1144. PubMed ID: 28685638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
Doss M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The linear no-threshold dose-effect relation: is it relevant to radiation protection regulation?
Nussbaum RH
Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):291-9; discussion 300. PubMed ID: 9547496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose reconstruction for the million worker study: status and guidelines.
Bouville A; Toohey RE; Boice JD; Beck HL; Dauer LT; Eckerman KF; Hagemeyer D; Leggett RW; Mumma MT; Napier B; Pryor KH; Rosenstein M; Schauer DA; Sherbini S; Stram DO; Thompson JL; Till JE; Yoder C; Zeitlin C
Health Phys; 2015 Feb; 108(2):206-20. PubMed ID: 25551504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radar commentary: Use of linear no-threshold hypothesis in radiation protection regulation in the United States.
Siegel JA; Stabin MG
Health Phys; 2012 Jan; 102(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 22134084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward improved ionizing radiation safety standards.
Raabe OG
Health Phys; 2011 Jul; 101(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 21617395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The scientific basis for the use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model at low doses and dose rates in radiological protection.
Laurier D; Billarand Y; Klokov D; Leuraud K
J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jun; 43(2):. PubMed ID: 37339605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification of radiation effects for dose limitation purposes: history, current situation and future prospects.
Hamada N; Fujimichi Y
J Radiat Res; 2014 Jul; 55(4):629-40. PubMed ID: 24794798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uncertainties in estimating health risks associated with exposure to ionising radiation.
Preston RJ; Boice JD; Brill AB; Chakraborty R; Conolly R; Hoffman FO; Hornung RW; Kocher DC; Land CE; Shore RE; Woloschak GE
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Sep; 33(3):573-88. PubMed ID: 23803503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation Biology and Its Role in the Canadian Radiation Protection Framework.
Leblanc JE; Burtt JJ
Health Phys; 2019 Sep; 117(3):319-329. PubMed ID: 30907783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Update on linear non-threshold dose-response model and implications for diagnostic radiology procedures.
Preston RJ
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 18849687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. NCRP Program Area Committee 6: Radiation Dosimetry and Measurements.
Simon SL
Health Phys; 2018 Feb; 114(2):257-258. PubMed ID: 30086027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A critical evaluation of the NCRP COMMENTARY 27 endorsement of the linear no-threshold model of radiation effects.
Ulsh BA
Environ Res; 2018 Nov; 167():472-487. PubMed ID: 30138826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. NCRP Vision for the Future and Program Area Committee Activities.
Boice JD
Health Phys; 2017 Feb; 112(2):225-229. PubMed ID: 28027166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE), quality factor (Q), and radiation weighting factor (w(R)). A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Task Group on Radiation Quality Effects in Radiological Protection, Committee 1 on Radiation Effects, International Commission on Radiological Protection
Ann ICRP; 2003; 33(4):1-117. PubMed ID: 14614921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using personal monitoring data to derive organ doses for medical radiation workers in the Million Person Study-considerations regarding NCRP Commentary no. 30.
Yoder C; Balter S; Boice JD; Grogan H; Mumma M; Rothenberg LN; Passmore C; Vetter RJ; Dauer LT
J Radiol Prot; 2021 Feb; 41(1):. PubMed ID: 33264760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. NCRP Program Area Committee 1: Basic Criteria, Epidemiology, Radiobiology, and Risk.
Bernstein J; Woloschak GE
Health Phys; 2018 Feb; 114(2):243-245. PubMed ID: 30086022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
