These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30586172)

  • 1. Unexpected Creatures: Procreative Liberty and the Frankenstein Ballet.
    Garland-Thomson R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2018 Nov; 48(6):18-20. PubMed ID: 30586172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rereading Frankenstein: What If Victor Frankenstein Had Actually Been Evil?
    Robert JS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2018 Nov; 48(6):21-24. PubMed ID: 30586185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On Cute Monkeys and Repulsive Monsters.
    Chambers TS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2018 Nov; 48(6):12-14. PubMed ID: 30586180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley's Frankenstein, or the modern Prometheus: a psychological study of unrepaired shame.
    Severino SK; Morrison NK
    J Pastoral Care Counsel; 2013; 67(3-4):5. PubMed ID: 24720244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frankenstein; or, the modern Prometheus: a classic novel to stimulate the analysis of complex contemporary issues in biomedical sciences.
    Cambra-Badii I; Guardiola E; Baños JE
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Feb; 22(1):17. PubMed ID: 33622293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Inhumanly brought back to life and misery": Mary Wollstonecraft, Frankenstein, and the Royal Humane Society.
    Williams C
    Womens Writ; 2001; 8(2):213-34. PubMed ID: 20196242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Ethical Interest of Frankenstein; Or, the Modern Prometheus: A Literature Review 200 Years After Its Publication.
    Cambra-Badii I; Guardiola E; Baños JE
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Oct; 26(5):2791-2808. PubMed ID: 32533445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facing the Pariah of Science: The Frankenstein Myth as a Social and Ethical Reference for Scientists.
    Nagy P; Wylie R; Eschrich J; Finn E
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):737-759. PubMed ID: 31292834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why Frankenstein is a Stigma Among Scientists.
    Nagy P; Wylie R; Eschrich J; Finn E
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1143-1159. PubMed ID: 28653167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A study of development of medicine and science in the nineteenth century science fiction: biomedical experiments in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein].
    Choo JU
    Uisahak; 2014 Dec; 23(3):543-72. PubMed ID: 25608508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11.
    Jones AH
    Perspect Biol Med; 2019; 62(4):710-716. PubMed ID: 31761802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Procreative liberty, enhancement and commodification in the human cloning debate.
    Shapshay S
    Health Care Anal; 2012 Dec; 20(4):356-66. PubMed ID: 22983766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Enduring Influence of a Dangerous Narrative: How Scientists Can Mitigate the Frankenstein Myth.
    Nagy P; Wylie R; Eschrich J; Finn E
    J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Jun; 15(2):279-292. PubMed ID: 29525895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speaking with Frankenstein.
    Lewis J; Shapiro J
    J Med Humanit; 2022 Jun; 43(2):267-282. PubMed ID: 32820412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can Mary Shelley's Frankenstein be read as an early research ethics text?
    Davies H
    Med Humanit; 2004 Jun; 30(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 15341043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproductive autonomy as self-making: procreative liberty and the practice of ethical subjectivity.
    Mills C
    J Med Philos; 2013 Dec; 38(6):639-56. PubMed ID: 24225390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The argument for unlimited procreative liberty: a feminist critique.
    Ryan MA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):6-12. PubMed ID: 2211090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "How dare you sport thus with life?": Frankensteinian fictions as case studies in scientific ethics.
    Goldbort RC
    J Med Humanit; 1995; 16(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 11652921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Victor Frankenstein's Institutional Review Board Proposal, 1790.
    Harrison G; Gannon WL
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Oct; 21(5):1139-57. PubMed ID: 25218836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reflecting on the Bicentennial of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: From Novel to Film and the 2 Brains.
    Wijdicks EFM
    JAMA Neurol; 2018 Feb; 75(2):149-150. PubMed ID: 29279904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.